Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.
Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of an action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing that action.
At one point of time a every person has to take an action which can be either beneficial or detrimental. Defining the action is unscrupulous and depends for each individual. This can lead to enmity or happiness within a society.
Firstly,an action has to be taken with the account of all the possible scenarios.One cannot be neglected and eschewed for their lack of capabilities. A person has to make wise and cogent discussions with more experienced people before arriving at a conclusion. Considering an example to bolster this claim,government charges tax to maintain and inventing new projects for well-being of the society. Taxes helps government to help us eventually. Some people may reprimand taxes and claim to reduce tax percentage for their own benefit. This could be avoided by applying firm decisions and which could lead to better economy for the country.
Secondly, teacher's job has duties and responsibilities of inculcating good morals, values and ethics in children. He follows this duty moralistically by reading aphoristic stories or teaching good manners and values. But still, some of his students may turn out to be depraved. This result is not parallel with the efforts put in by the teacher. Moreover, the intention of the teacher is moralistically good but due to other circumstances like the parental role models and peer groups of the student, the student may turn out to be the black sheep. If we were to go by the way this student has turned out, we may erroneously conclude that the teacher's actions were unethical. However, the intent of the teacher was always good and hence we must assess a person's morality by their intent.
However, eccentric people who have no regrets and ignominious deserve to be questionable. For example, Adolf Hitler had took so many innocent lives of people. His intentions and decisions to destroy a country which had truculence to fight against Germany. So, when assessing the morality of an action, the results of an action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing that action.
In conclusion, we must always assess the morality of an action by the intention of the person than by making the results a yardstick of their morality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
At one point of time a every person has to take an action whic...
^
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , an
... or happiness within a society. Firstly,an action has to be taken with the account...
^^^
Line 2, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: One
...e account of all the possible scenarios.One cannot be neglected and eschewed for th...
^^^
Line 2, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neglected and eschewed for their lack of capabilities. A person has to make wise ...
^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , government
...idering an example to bolster this claim,government charges tax to maintain and inventing n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 754, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... always good and hence we must assess a persons morality by their intent. However, ec...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 121, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...tionable. For example, Adolf Hitler had took so many innocent lives of people. His i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...truculence to fight against Germany. So, when assessing the morality of an action...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02972972973 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93211357091 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1424707192 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.619047619 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279585681187 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826370822276 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146421771205 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199724737359 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113141654434 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.