The author of this statement claims that in any field – business, politics, education, government, those in power should step down after five years. And reason for this claim is it will be surest path of success. But I disagree to this claims to some extent.
Person who is in power of any institutions is the one who is leading the institutions towards its progress and prosperity. They have faced success and failure during the duration of their realm and these experience is much important while taking any decision regarding development of an institutions. So, if the power are step down after five years these experience person would be lost. This would directly or indirectly harm the development of any institution.
It is not sure the new person in power would be as cooperative and encouraging development as the pervious power head. This will indirectly harms the co-worker and people working under the new power. Consequently, this will leads to less effective works and development will be lack. For instance, in an office the manager was very friendly and cooperative with his co-worker but he was replaced with new manager who is laconic and dogmatic. In this environment co-worker are demotivated to work and weekly performance of workers seemed to decrease by significant amount. So, rather than revitalizing the success it leads to degrading in such cases.
But, we cannot ignore if, single power is stable for long period of time it would turn to monarchy, or autocratic. If person in power is gullible and corruptive its better to replace them within a short period of time. So, organizations should be cautious about the activity of the head who is in power. If any misnomers or and deceptive activity is observed then they should step down those person in power no matter what is his ruling period. However, if, the head is actively involving in progressive works and showing keen interest for development then they should not be step down by constricting time.
At last, the claim seems to be controversial at first but if we got on depth and analyze we can conclude that its better not to step down the power after five years. But flexible policies should be maintain such that power can be step down if any misleads or misnomers activity is encounter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the surest'.
Suggestion: be the surest
...s. And reason for this claim is it will be surest path of success. But I disagree to this...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rest path of success. But I disagree to this claims to some extent. Person who is i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an institution' or simply 'institutions'?
Suggestion: an institution; institutions
...g any decision regarding development of an institutions. So, if the power are step down after f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'harm'
Suggestion: harm
...rvious power head. This will indirectly harms the co-worker and people working under ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... the new power. Consequently, this will leads to less effective works and development...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ore if, single power is stable for long period of time it would turn to monarchy, or autocrati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 203, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s better to replace them within a short period of time. So, organizations should be cautious a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this person' or 'those people', 'those persons'?
Suggestion: this person; those people; those persons
... is observed then they should step down those person in power no matter what is his ruling p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 467, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...is ruling period. However, if, the head is actively involving in progressive works and showing keen i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintained'?
Suggestion: maintained
... years. But flexible policies should be maintain such that power can be step down if any...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, so, then, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90697674419 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76095258981 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488372093023 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9730983284 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.95 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343011157084 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107730791443 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111530647046 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218510447524 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139540398435 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.