Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Controlling and managing power in different fileds has always been a controversial issue. Governments as the most important field in controling power have seen different improvement from dictatorship to democracy and it is countining to progress. The claim suggest that all persons in the power should step down after five years and the provided reason is that it ensure the success of the organization. I mostly agree with this statement and I will explain my reasons now.
First of all, the governor or the boss of the country, organization or comapny has enough time to implement his ideas and innovatiove plans in 5 years. Therefore, after 5 years even if he would successful, he would not have any special ideas and he should leave the position for other people with new ideas and the progress of the organization would countinue. Besides, the former boss find a free time to learn new things and ideas and may be in the future he can take the control of the organization again. For example, Stive Jobes was the manager of Apple company and he was successful in his career but after some years managing committee decided to change the manager and assign a new person for managing to approve the progress of the comapany.
Moreover, a manager could find the deficies of the organization she is workig for. She could find a way for curroption after some years. Therefore, it is suggeted to to change the manager after some years to ensure prevent financial abuse of problems of the organization. This process is very common specially in the financial organizations. For instance, in central bank of the United Stated, the manager would change after about 5 years. It assure that former manager would not use the holes of the system for financial abuse.
On the other hand, some maintain managers attain valuable experiences during managing periods and these experience could help organization to enhance and expedite the advancement of organizations. By setting down the managers after 5 years, the organization should pay huge cost to attain these experience again. Although the provided reason looks coget at the first glance, when delve deeper we find some holes. To take advantages of the earned experience of former manager, organizations do different activities such as use them as consultant or registering as managing committe. For example, after finishing president periods in Iran, the former president will be member of a committe that can help government in different dificulties or provide solution for current problems.
In conclusion, though changing manager may have some disadvantages for organizations or governments such losing earned experiences, changing managers after a peroid has more benefits such as bringing new ideas and innovative plans to the organiations. Besides, The disadvantages of changing manager could be decreased by using them as consultant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...it is countining to progress. The claim suggest that all persons in the power should st...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and he was successful in his career but after some years managing committee deci...
^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...r some years. Therefore, it is suggeted to to change the manager after some years to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assures'?
Suggestion: assures
...er would change after about 5 years. It assure that former manager would not use the h...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2421.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17307692308 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92776761018 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7071883928 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152322336681 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507218375535 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591739496445 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956845387066 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052356375399 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.