Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reasons on which that claim is based.
The issue of whether or not the effect of changing power is contentious one. While each side has strengths and weakness, I believe that any types of fields’ power should be changed after five years. This is because; sustenance of power for a long time in any field can be detrimental and shift of power in any field reducing inequity.
Firstly, one of the reasons for my specific thought is that long time sustenance in power for long time can produce deleterious effect to the public. Because there is a probability to abuse the power in case of long-term sustenance. I have to admit my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by the critical example. In case of monarchy country such as Quarter, North Koria etc discrimination is happening among the ordinary people. This discrepancy is occurring day by day between people in power and people without power, so making situation worse. Again, these countries slowed down day by day in comparing to other same resources countries with democracy. Therefore, we can say that sustenance of power for a long time hamper the development of the countries.
Secondly, why I illustrate my specific thought is that in any sensitive field shifting of power should be occurred in regular basis to reduce the inequality. Because, long term sustaining in any field creating inequality in the given situation and may create chaos among the people and ultimately can damage the fluency of the working environment. A striking example is a compelling illustration of this fairness is a quality is very crucial in the field of education, because it nurture the future filler of the society. It is sometimes seen that the result of any education system is manipulated and it only occurs most of the time due to the consolidated authority. On the same time, in case of business the power should be changed to make transparent the exchange phenomenon. So, it is clear to see that power should be changed in a regular basis.
However, some might argue that there are some case single power for a long time elicits good result. But, it is not right for all the time because if there are no adequate qualified successor may create a terrible problem in the system. So in case of this situation new leadership can solve the problem in very smooth way.
To sum up, from the above stated reasons, it is conspicuous to say that power in any field should be changed after five years, because sustenance of power for a long time in any field can be detrimental and shift of power in any field reducing inequity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not the effect of changing power is content...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oduce deleterious effect to the public. Because there is a probability to abuse the pow...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nurtures'?
Suggestion: nurtures
...l in the field of education, because it nurture the future filler of the society. It is...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'successors'?
Suggestion: successors
...ause if there are no adequate qualified successor may create a terrible problem in the sy...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80952380952 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71654382397 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6246407609 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.05 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211863159464 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069384665467 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627938701463 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148297740053 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723945417496 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.