Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Nowadays, people get introduced with a lot of information which is hard to tell the true one apart from the false information. In fact, it is hard to find the true information and sometimes people never find it. The prompt recommends that any piece of information can’t be taken as true because it might prove false in the future. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this claim and argue that if a given information is a fact, it should be trusted for two reasons, even though means it is proven as real but might change in the future.
To begin, facts are very important because they are based on true information as long as they are collected by responsible people and offered by accurate sources. Thus, instead of thinking as being in front of false information and considering everything as inaccurate, people need to consider facts apart from opinions. For example, exploring different websites, a gush of information flows and hits the readers by confusing them to choose the right information. They can see the sources, the facts, if they are already proven as research based on concrete information. Consequently, people can trust the most popular news sources about different scandals or issues that need an explanation or a solution. However, some actual information may turn out to be inaccurate and that is ok, because it is the reality that sometimes changes due to different factors. The above example illustrates that facts are not opinions and they should be trusted, even though sometimes they bring out inaccurate information.
Further, even though we assume that we cannot trust facts because they change in the future, we should still trust because they represent the truth as long as they are not proven false. Trusting is a big virtue of people along with the trust the science gets from us. For example, people face different problems, like diseases, loses and it is hard to find trust on how to solve these issues. Research has shown that positivity, trust and collaboration help people win their battles more than those who don’t trust doctors and science. In other words, it might have place for change on facts or solutions, but the cause is positive and should go through trust. Thus, people should trust more to accurate known sources than wasting time on false proven sources. One needs to look at how people in the past missed lots of information compared with now when they can reach all kind of information ,making it hard to tell the true from the inaccurate one.
Of course any piece of information referred to as a fact may be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future and this is necessary to choose the factually proven information. However isn’t that precisely why we should know who to trust. If we do so, we are likely not to get lost in false information and wrong solutions when facing different issues. We cannot waste time on useless facts that come from unstable resources. People do not have to ignore their inner guts and they can trust them as long as they follow the trusted sources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reasons, even though means it is proven as real but might change in the future....
^^
Line 1, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n though means it is proven as real but might change in the future. To begin...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... real but might change in the future. To begin, facts are very important becau...
^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r example, exploring different websites, a gush of information flows and hits the...
^^
Line 5, column 894, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n they can reach all kind of information ,making it hard to tell the true from the...
^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hoose the factually proven information. However isn’t that precisely why we should know...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, well, apart from, for example, in fact, kind of, of course, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2554.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84629981025 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59062280329 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451612903226 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 782.1 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4496331727 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.043478261 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9130434783 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91304347826 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31869724813 0.243740707755 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100938340574 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105060970629 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224417617103 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699321668255 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.