Claim: In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The statement claims that the revitalization of leadership is necessary after every five years whether it is business, politics, education or government. I agree that the change in leadership is necessary in certain cases such as in government to maintain the transperancy and efficiency of those who are in power. However, the statement unneccessarily claims that leadership should be changed every five years in any enterprise because revitalization will bring success. Hence, I find the statement's contention indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint.
The chief reason why I disagree with the statement is that it claims that the change in leadership in any field or enterprise after five years will surely bring succeess. Nevertheless, it is not suitable for every enterprises and organizations. It seems uncompeling to generate a same strategy for all kinds of enetrprises and organizations. The change of leadership might work for one enterprise or organization does not neccessarily mean that it will work for all the other fields. The change in leadership is neccessary if an enterprise recieves complaints against those who are in power but without any reason, why would enetrprises change their leaders after five years?
The second reason for my disagreement with the statement is that it unnccessarily give surity that after changing the leaders the enetrprise or organization will get success. The change in leadership brings many changes in the working of the system. Hence, the people who work under the leader have to adjust with the new changes and this adjustment takes time. Hence, their efficiency of working might be decreased and this will affect the efficiency of the whole enterprise. So, change in leadership will have opposite results than the statement has claimed.
The third reason for my disagreement with statement is that its claim for change in leadership after every five years not six or seven. The new leader will have different plans, views and strategies for the eneterprise than the previous one and there is no guarantee that these plans and strategy will be fulfilled in five years. There are chances that to completely apply these startegies and plans might take loger period of time than five years. One enterprise or organization successfully executes their new startegy in five years does not mean every other enetrprise will execute their startegy in five years: they may need six or more years.
In sum, the statement is fundamentally flawed because it assumes that the change in leadership after every five years will bring success to every enterprise and organization. I agree that the renewal of leadership after five years may bring success in some enterprises but it does not neccessarily mean by applying the same strategy in different enterprises and organizations will surely bring success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 491, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'statements'' or 'statement's'?
Suggestion: statements'; statement's
...n will bring success. Hence, I find the statements contention indefensible from both an em...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nge their leaders after five years? The second reason for my disagreement with ...
^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...prise or organization will get success. The change in leadership brings many change...
^^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e startegies and plans might take loger period of time than five years. One enterprise or orga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2424.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29257641921 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99074996339 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403930131004 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4218838836 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.2 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261127064014 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995121753788 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784262208612 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176512093969 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712714908602 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.