Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of
the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the claim and the reason on which that claim is based
For a researcher to understand the character of a particular tribe, it is pertinent for such researcher to consider several factors. These factors subsumes the tribe’s judicial system, morals, customs, and tradition. However, it is grotesque to consider heroes and role models as one of the factors needed to understand the attributes of a particular society. Hence, while other factors are considered, heroes and role models should not be chosen as a determining factor of the characteristics of a particular society.
To begin with, the historical trend of a particular society will provide deep insight into how this society live their lives. Historical records are reflective image of a society. These annals, which constitute of how adversaries are treated by a group and how comeuppance are dolted out to offenders and recidivist, will give deeper understanding of the level of empathy in this group. Additionally, they also provide clear insight on the methods these groups adopt to overcome adversaries. Also, through historical records, one can understand how this society treat women and animals.
Apart from studying historical trends, one need to study the society’s way of life. Through the study of a tribe’s quotidian activity, one would gain comprehensive understanding of the type of comestible they feed on, how these edibles are derived, the form of polity they adopt, how hidalgos and elites are treated, and the form of training and education given to progenies. These are weighty attributes a researcher will definitely study in a group.
However, a well-learned individual might cavil that heroes and role models are true emblems of a particular tribe. They might contend that it is extraneous to consider other forms such history and mores of the society. Thus, one should study only the men and women considered as heroes. However, it is ludicrous to say because Adolf Hitler is a martinet, the gamut of Germans are also strict disciplinarians. It is absurd to say because Mahatma Gandhi is a pacifist, the full-bore of Indians are dovish. Making induction using few people is largely detrimental to a study.
In conclusion, several factors are to be considered when studying the traits of a group. These qualities include the mores of the society, their way of subsistence, and the technique adopted to upbring their scions. However, relying on the study of qualities of these society’s heroes is insufficient. These heroes are humans. They are also likely to err. And it will be ridiculous to attribute the quality of a hero to the hero’s natural habitat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'subsume'.
Suggestion: subsume
...consider several factors. These factors subsumes the tribe’s judicial system, morals, cu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...ear insight on the methods these groups adopt to overcome adversaries. Also, through his...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 263, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this society' or 'these societies'?
Suggestion: this society; these societies
...r, relying on the study of qualities of these society’s heroes is insufficient. These heroes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, apart from, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23205741627 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97489649522 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480861244019 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8697795543 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.125 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183629734641 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537808475385 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597046573436 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989291885228 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359527498613 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.