Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
When it comes to the approach to understanding a society, some people advocate that outsiders should assign priority to the group the society regards as its heroes or role models. It is because citizens are inclined to attach the highest ideals to their heroes. While this view has its merit, I am, to some degree, at odds with the claim and believe these charaters, which seem to be reflected by role models, are not comprehensive and sometimes biased. Therefore, researchers should also pay their attention to ordinary people to fully devlve a society.
To begin with, we have to recognize that heroes and public figures offer foreigners a great opportunity to explore some significant charaters of a group of people.
However, the aformentioned statement hinges on an unsubstantiated assumption that people who have been selected as role models can represent the whole population. This presumption is not always held for two reasons. First, even though as we have demonstrated above, heroes have embodies the dreams of a country, they usually turn a blind eye to the negative side of the society. These features even though are contempted by the society but deeply embedded into its genes. With the development of its economy and technology, the world has observed a series of heroes who have merged in the Chinese society. Chinese people praised them as technological heroes of the country contributing to the China’s technological domination in the world. On the contrary, in the summer of 2018, the sanction on ZTE, a Chinese communication company, fully showed the lack of rule of law in this society.
Second, to serve some political and ideological purposes, heroes may be polished by the authority, which gives rise to a false image of the society. For instance, during the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, the national media in China were repeatedly reporting the story of a men called Tan Qianqiu. He was described as a hero in the earthquake, since he was reported to protect two students sacrificing his life. What was ironic was that the whole story was forged by local officials aiming to create a hero to encourage the society.
In such a circumstance, the claim is rendered questionable, because the charaters what heroes have reflected have been polished or even created by the government.
To summarize, as I have manifested above, if the outside world wants to gain a profound understanding of a society, not only need it to focus on these who are being advocated, but also analyze the common citizens in that area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iew has its merit, I am, to some degree, at odds with the claim and believe these...
^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a man' or simply 'men'?
Suggestion: a man; men
... were repeatedly reporting the story of a men called Tan Qianqiu. He was described as...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: MAN_MEN[1]
Message: 'man' is the singular form of 'men'. Consider using 'man'?
Suggestion: man
...ere repeatedly reporting the story of a men called Tan Qianqiu. He was described as...
^^^
Line 10, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alyze the common citizens in that area.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, as for, for instance, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05700712589 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91851408327 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53919239905 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8467853881 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.277777778 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197765951128 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578382386452 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610960830936 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863766558004 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653022322703 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.