Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
The issue to be addressed here is that the perfect way to judge a society is to analyize the character of men and women that community idolise as their heroes or role models. The reason that supports this claim suggest that people of such high respect reveal the society's highest ideals. We can arrive at a conclusion through a few examples.
heroes are people who have done something great or extraordinary for their colleagues or a community as a whole. they did so not for their own benefit but for the the upliftment of the society. Children are always asked to have a role model so that the child can follow them and streamline their career. Sir Abraham lincoln is considered a hero because he worked for citizens's right by not following any unjust practises. Hence people of united states hail him a hero and outside the states The united states is judged based on such ideals followed by lincoln.
Another view at the given claim can be if these people presented as heroes do not follow the said ideals then this gives a very bad impression about the background it represents. For example pope is regarded as the voice of god on earth so any practise that he follows is termed as way of god. Now if pope indulges in spome bad thing like corruption or money laundering then this gives citizen of diffrentnon-christian countries a false message about the religion epitomised by pope.
Thus all in all hereos are made by people and it is their responsility to follow practises that are commensurate with the society they represent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'societys the highest'.
Suggestion: societys the highest
... people of such high respect reveal the societys highest ideals. We can arrive at a conclusion t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Heroes
...conclusion through a few examples. heroes are people who have done something grea...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...r colleagues or a community as a whole. they did so not for their own benefit but fo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...id so not for their own benefit but for the the upliftment of the society. Children are...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...id so not for their own benefit but for the the upliftment of the society. Children are...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... by not following any unjust practises. Hence people of united states hail him a hero...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t the religion epitomised by pope. Thus all in all hereos are made by people an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 270.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74444444444 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71140708767 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5424549469 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202105351139 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734766114304 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0969955481999 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135239977682 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135129351317 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.