Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
A number of factors are there in order to evaluate the character of a society; character of people is one of them. Although the role models of our community represents face of our society to some extent, but basing a society character solely on the characters of few elites will not be justifiable. I completely disagree with the assertion that examining the character of men and women, chosen as heroes or role models, is the best way to apprehend the character of a society. There are numerous examples to justify my take on this statement but few are the life-styles of heroes, cricketers, and politicians.
In South India, Rajnikant, a veteran Bollywood actor, is celebrated as an incarnation of god. If we look at the life of Rajnikant, he boasts a very extravagant lifestyle- possessing lavish house, car- and his decorous character is so sublime as though he seems to belong from very wealthy, and well educated society. But in fact, he belongs from a impoverish society where getting even fundamental needs for living is very difficult.
Similarly, we can take the life of Lal Babu Raut( a politician from Nepal). He is well educated, decorated with very propriety characters. Having tremendously successful business venture, he is one of the richest persons in Nepal. If the society he belongs to is judged based upon his character and demeanor, it will be misleading. On the other hand, the society-where Lal Babu Raut lives in, is under-privileged. They have no access to drinkable water, shelter.
Without a doubt, it is true that our heroes and role models are ornaments of our community, therefore, they should be made capable enough to afford for every needs. Even, government should consider them special, guarantying their better living. However, a society is not what those people look like. Even the seemingly beautiful things have scars and bruises in closer view. Undoubtedly, a society is evaluated upon deliberate scrutiny of the traits and typical characteristics that the majority of people bears.
In summary, of course, there are people in the society, who are regarded as the role models, somehow are the face of the society; however the characters they possess can’t be the best indicator in order to depict society. Majority of general public is there to reflect the real face of society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d society. But in fact, he belongs from a impoverish society where getting even f...
^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d society. But in fact, he belongs from a impoverish society where getting even fundamental ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...in order to depict society. Majority of general public is there to reflect the real face of so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, well, in fact, in summary, of course, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04404145078 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90434266475 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6610862022 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.35 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261438341569 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688652795309 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908319128436 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137733693422 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110247640731 0.0667264976115 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.