Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Every society have some people be it men or women who are well known particulary to that group and to whom the people have a relentless faith. The prompt identifies these famous people as heros and role models and claims that the character of these famous icon of society represents the overall character of people living in that area. I mostly agree with the prompt and provide two explanations but also present a few cases where these lionized people are misleading.
Firstly, it can be agreed that a society accolades people who are in some ways better that the common people. These consummate people are revered by general because they have done something great for the welfare of the society. For instance, a well known musician refelects his community. The genre of song he sings is favourable to most of the people. The way he dresses comes from the society tradition and that which is accepted by the people. If he does not reflect the society and did not math the feeling of the people he would not have been famous. A person is considered a role model if and only if he is truely accepted as a representative as well as promoter of the people and the sciety he lives.
Moreover, not only living but the deeds of person who passed away contributing to the particular area are can also give a detailed knowledge of a society. For example, Nepali people are known for bravery and are also called "Gorkhalis" moslty by English people because they fought without any fear and defended the country from East India Company captured by England. Even these Nepalese have less arms and were not advanced in warefare as the English army they protected the country from colonism. Due to this Nepali army are famous in world for their bravery and are recruited to serve in front line in wars. England recruites several Nepalese as British Gorkha Army every year even today. This is a true example of the character of heros representing charater of a society.
However, these role models can sometimes be misleading. A leader appointed by getting vote of many people after being in a sinecure postion might forget his people and society. There are cogent people who can initially make people happy by providing small benifts to the society and eventually reveal their true character once they get a respected positoin with many opportunities. Many leaders who are selected and voted by people have been witnessed to be dictator at last. Such people can never give true colors of their originality.
In conclusion, an erdutie person always dedicated to the society and are also liked by the people since a long time are the true representative of a society and reflect the characcter of the people but there can always be an anomaly where people change their attitude one they have their heyday.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
Every society have some people be it men or women who are ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun arms is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ed by England. Even these Nepalese have less arms and were not advanced in warefare...
^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y England. Even these Nepalese have less arms and were not advanced in warefare a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2324.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8115942029 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60191039752 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467908902692 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.9 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2616639618 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.636363636 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9545454545 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149039317522 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503601655752 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659018031357 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956492226858 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548920613613 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.