Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
The issue writer contends government should ensure major cities receive enough financial support since mostly these cities preserve and generate nation’s cultural traditions. However, some people might agree with this statement I believe small cities and towns are more interested in traditions and cultural acts. In the following paragraphs, the most important reasons supporting my viewpoint are discussed.
The first reason to be mentioned is that the people in big cities do not have enough time and energy to engage in the cultural activities. That is because most of the people in large cities are working for eight hours a day since living expenses in such cities is higher compared to the small cities. Therefore, major city population does not play an important role in preservation and generation of cultural traditions. As a result, governments are not required to ensure that big cities receive enough financial support to thrive.
The second reason to be mentioned is that people in big cities are from different cultures and have different cultural traditions. Consider Chicago as an example; people in this huge city have different languages and traditions. Some of them are Asian while others are African-American even some people are Indian. Therefore, big cities cannot generate or keep traditions because of diversity of their population. However, most of the small cities have a population from the same culture which will result in a thriving culture.
In conclusion, large cities does not play an important role in generating and keeping traditions because of their diversity of population from different cultures. Also, people in major cities do not have enough time and energy to get engaged in such activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, even so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35636363636 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80378964326 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469090909091 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0964083695 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.214285714 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337138720733 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13682551 0.0831039109588 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939907872461 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238537583681 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824014675976 0.0667264976115 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.