Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation’s culture traditions are preserved and generated.
To say that the cities of a nation storehouse its diverse culture and history is an entirely fair statement. A nation is but a collective of people; where the citizen reside, so does the soul. However, no policy should operate on generalizations and absolutes, therefore, I believe that support should be qualified in a manner such that the system remains adaptable; incentivizing the preservation of old while simultaneously encouraging the growth of the new.
The greatest receptacles of knowledge of our past are often the great cities of old. The less these cities fell to squalor and conflict, the more they are able to tell. Not only do cities retain culture with support, but they grow their own. On the modern scale, compare, for example, buffalo, which was a powerhouse of industry in the early 1900's but which has lost all of its vigor, to a metropolitan giant like San Francisco, which through attraction of capital, has both maintained a historical culture while driving the invention of a new one.
cities and their inhabitants should be given the tools to thrive, but that does not mean the gift should come without consideration. After all, the government funds a city with the taxes from all across the country, so surely resources should be allocated based on potential, effort, and need. Citing the case from above, when buffalo was destabilized through de-industrialization, the government could very well have stepped in to aid in a transition, rather than letting the otherwise well established city fall from grace, leading to huge population displacement.
As declared previously, the people make up the soul of a city, so it is up to the people to determine what is worth preserving and make their case to the judges and distributors of financial resources. Conversely, it is also the governing body's responsibility to maintain awareness of potential pitfalls and to de-risk communities by actively engaging in a support strategy to ensure that the citizens are never encumbered with the dread of sudden crisis.
often, the true value of something is not known until its time has passed; if you protect the things that people hold dear now, then it may serve a future generation with great insight and purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cities
...iving the invention of a new one. cities and their inhabitants should be given t...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eading to huge population displacement. As declared previously, the people make ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mbered with the dread of sudden crisis. often, the true value of something is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Often
...with the dread of sudden crisis. often, the true value of something is not kno...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, after all, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 371.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0781671159 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98555941137 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606469002695 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5791903481 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.923076923 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5384615385 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219417696357 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774223197774 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571012371003 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981159427287 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533860108893 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.