Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author claims that the government should give funds to only the major cities since the nation's cultural traditions are preserved and initiated there. Every country's government should give funds to the cultural strong parts to become more developed. However, I neither agree with the claim nor with the reason because the statement claims that the government should give the funds to only the major cities.
First of all, it is the wrong policy to concentrate only on the major cities. Because most of the cultural tradition is preserved mostly in villages or small towns. For example, places like Varanasi and Mysore in India has a well-known history, tradition, architecture, and palaces. Also, most of the profit is generated from these places as tourist go to visit such places. Therefore it is necessary to give funds to such a place to keep the aesthetics of these places, as it also results in the growth of the economy of the nation.
Even though the government provides financial support to the major cities, other factors may be also responsible for the development of the cities. For instance, the management should be good not only providing funds will flourish the cities. Because the major cities are confronting more to corruption. Such practices in the major cities will not be beneficial for the cultural traditions to keep. Instead, the condition will get worse if these practices are continued in the future.
However, it is also specious that primarily in cities the cultural traditions are preserved and generated. It is true to some extent that, the major country around the world such as London and Paris are famous for the Tower of London and Eiffel Tower. As they are popular ones, these places will remain renown further also. But in small towns, for instance, villages in India where the traditions are vanishing day by day, if the government will not fund such places then the aesthetics of such places will completely vanish in upcoming years. And the future generations will get familiar with these traditions.
Thus, to keep the nation's cultural traditions, it is equally important to aid financial assistance to the major cities as well as to the minor cities. Again, providing the fund to the famous tourist places where the cultural activities are still pristine, it will result in the growth of an economy through the tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ces as tourist go to visit such places. Therefore it is necessary to give funds to such a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oviding funds will flourish the cities. Because the major cities are confronting more t...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 319, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...these places will remain renown further also. But in small towns, for instance, vill...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05583756345 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5757507642 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454314720812 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2248711338 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213677489338 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776667068845 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852433473395 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127682302647 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466931032343 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.