Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.
Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Over the years, there have been several contentions on why major cities generally receive the most attention from the governments compared to the other remote locations in the country. Some studies have attributed this seemingly unfair attention to be as a result of the greater number of human populations that reside in the cities. For us to gain a more knowledgeable incite on government’s interaction and attention to its cities, the prompt argues that government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they require in order to thrive. I mostly agree with this argument for two reasons which I will elucidate below. However, I do concede that, a certain number of financial resources should also be allocated to improving other parts of the country besides the major cities.
To begin, the prompt posited that a nations’ cultural traditions are usually generated and well preserved primarily in the cities, and I agree with this fact because the major cities are representative of the whole country. It is quite a fact that a significantly higher number of a country’s population reside in the city compared to other remote locations in the country. This high figure makes it convenient to aver that the majority of a country’s cultural tradition are being uphold among the major city residents. In other words, it is the people that live in major cities that actually boost and propel the culture of a country, and showcase it to the outside word. Therefore, the governments’ failure to allocate the right financial resources to support the major cities might engender a deterioration of the country as a whole, a situation which is not very palatable.
Secondly, it is important for governments to ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive because the major cities are the image that represents the whole country. When visitors from another country pays a visit to a particular country, they will most likely visit the cities, or pass through the major cities in the country. If the cities are not well developed, it will be like a stain in the country’s image, and this might affect the country’s world-view image. In order to boost relationships with other countries, enhance economy or business relationships with other countries, the country’s major cities have to be well developed since it will most likely be the welcoming home for prominent visitors from other countries. For instance, when Bill Gates came to Nigeria, he only to Lagos before returning. Had it been that Lagos is not in a very good shape, it would have precluded the arrival of Bill Gates, which might have a negative impact on the Nigeria economy. Therefore, it is quite advisable that governments pay much attention to the development of its major cities.
Admittedly, governments should not totally neglect the other parts of the country. They should in fact supply enough help to upgrade every location in the country as it will altogether bring about a positive result on the country.
In conclusion, I believe governments should focus on appropriating more financial resources to the major cities in a country while also paying attention to other non-major cities in the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other non-major cities in the country.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2735.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11214953271 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82259948739 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426168224299 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6649775999 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.75 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314860125789 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107920980129 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106666603851 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183911167747 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811003825595 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.