Claim: Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture-based instruction in college and university courses.
Reason: It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers to study a topic and to achieve a common goal.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
As social animals, group work is an important part of human life, especially when one stepped into the adult life and start to work in a company. No matter you are sole trader or incorporation, team work is essential, as it might affect the company’s future growth. School provided a great environment for students to practice before they get into the job market. However, team work is indeed important but I am not consent with the claim that the lectures should be supplant with team work.
On the one hand, group assignments are essential for students to learn how to work in a team. As everyone got their own self-phone, if is in lecture-based class, during the break, they could just play on their phone to avoid the awkwardness of deadly silence and in the end of semester, they still did get to know anyone in there classes, which is adverse for them to develop social skills. Hence, if the lecture are replaced with group work, they could get to know each other better and cultivate their skill Werther as a team member or even a leader.
On the other hand, some subjects might better be taught in a lecture-based class. For instance, the accountant subject that requires substantial amount of focus on details. To understand subject better, students need to remember how to record figures and apply accounting standards, therefore, if the students are in group, they might get distracted by team member and the teaching effiency will be unpleasant. Moreover, if the students working as a team, minority of people might be reluctant to devote their efforts in and leave most of the works to others, and get a grade that they don’t deserve.
In conclusion, replacing majority of lecture with group work might not be a wise idea as it not suitable for all the subjects and could courage some students to slack. Despite group work do cultivate student’s to work as a team, there had more limitations compare with the lecture-based class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consented'.
Suggestion: consented
...m work is indeed important but I am not consent with the claim that the lectures should...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supplanted'?
Suggestion: supplanted
...h the claim that the lectures should be supplant with team work. On the one hand, gr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 336.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82738095238 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65888932833 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3176012268 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.769230769 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262167840138 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112093822484 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615527485268 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183517173004 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511320147392 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.