Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.
Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Both imagination and experience are valuable assets. The claim suggests people can imagine freely to establish their core value. However, I agree partially in the claim. In my humble opinion, I believe that imagination and experience are both valuable in different scenario. And in the following paragraph, I will discuss my statements by examples.
First of all, imagination can be valuable in aesthetic workers, such as writer, singer, and architect. Because there is no correct answer in literature, music or even architecture design. The success of a masterpiece often related to its uniqueness. For instance, Taipei 101 is one of the successful buildings in Taiwan, and it is famous not only for its height, but also its special design. The designer of the Taipei 101, Mr. Bay, came up with its appearance by imaging bamboo, which is a kind of vegetable common used in traditional Chinese new year dinner. The imagination of the huge bamboo standing in Taipei city impressed the public undoubtedly, and they widely discussed of the building design. I believe that the creation with imagination can be appreciated by the public and that is the reason why I agree with the imagination is valuable asset in art.
Nevertheless, experience is important in the field of science and engineering, because the basic knowledge and fundamental are unchanged in this subject. To elaborate, a successful programmer in company should deliver a stable application for its business. And the correctness of coding logic comes from the education and working experience rather than imagination. Furthermore, it is experience make perfection of programming, not imagination.
To sum up, imagination is valuable in art field and experience is valuable in engineering. And based on scenario above mentioned, I only agree half of the claim.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, kind of, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30927835052 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11695404371 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2422831513 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8333333333 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2383268966 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754718096851 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681037736345 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149247343153 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586164329255 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.