The auhtor claims that knowing about past cannot help people to make decisions as today's world is more complex than past. The claim might not be true as certain evidences are provided in the body paragraphs.
To begin with, knowledge is an important tool for any person to acheive goals in his or her field of interest. Advancement of technolgy in various feilds like medical, software is very rapid in today's world. The reason to acheive this is due to some of the important decisions that were taken in the past.For instance, mobile phones today are advanced. To acheive it, knowledge that were known to people during it's initial development were required. From then, important decisions were taken to enchance phones by implementing more features that could help people in varities of ways apart from communication.
Additonally, considering the buisness feild, hiring process requires person to provide past experinces in the respective feilds. The reason being, it helps companies to know the abalities of a person, whether person is knowledgable, and moreover, determining whether hiring a particular person would help their buisness or not. Also, some of the structures that were built in the past helps people to make important decision or rather as a guide to help build more innovative structures.
In summary, knowing about past is required as it helps people to overcome mistakes.Also, Advancement in technology also requires basic knowledge that were implemented in the past in that particular technology followed by making decisions to provide enhanced features that would help people in more ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...d. The reason to acheive this is due to some of the important decisions that were taken in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...t decisions that were taken in the past.For instance, mobile phones today are advan...
^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...would help their buisness or not. Also, some of the structures that were built in the past ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...as it helps people to overcome mistakes.Also, Advancement in technology also require...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, then, apart from, as to, for instance, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 258.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28682170543 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80441289521 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538759689922 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 704.065955056 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2809531381 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313070824792 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130632109632 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142541934329 0.0758088955206 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2230506047 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1036288086 0.0667264976115 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.