Technology development has been growing rapidly from past few decades. Improvement in technology is a pith in people lives as it reduces some of the hard work that people might have to put for their work in order to reach their goal. For instance, computers that involves multitasking such as playing music, video and more. However, over usage of technology can also lead to decreased capability of thinking.
Firstly, technology gadgets serves a great purpose for people in many ways such as fitbit that counts number of steps taken by that person. For all this technology gadgets to be invented, it requires great thinking skills. Functioning of each and every element that constitutes gadget should be placed in correct order. Programming must be done in order to perform particular function that gadget has to perform. Thus, requiring great skills and thinking capabilities to achieve that particular operation. For instance, consider calculator that is used to solve convoluted math operations. It requires certain algorithm in order to perform all the operations. Thus, the man behind this discovery is required to put great skills and thinking accordingly.
Secondly, once technology is developed, it never ends there. There are many possibilities for that technology to be enhanced to provide more usage for the people. For instance, consider iphone, there are variety of versions that has been released. From the initial version to the latest version iphone, the features have been enhanced. Achieving the enhancements requires great knowledge and thinking capability.
However, over usage also harms people to think. For example, consider scenario where few people living in urban areas are more prone to usage of microwave. The device which eases the people work of cooking. In few scenarios there might be possibility that this kind of gadgets would not be available in rural areas. Solution for this problem can still be possible that involves usage of coal, matchsticks to achieve fire in order to perform cooking. But, since people are more used to microwave, they fail to think in a way similar to the above stated solutions.
In summary, the claim made by the author can be accepted to a certain extent as suggested by above scenario. In contrast, certain evidences are also provided that demurs the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...is a pith in people lives as it reduces some of the hard work that people might have to put...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to decreased capability of thinking. Firstly, technology gadgets serve...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eat skills and thinking accordingly. Secondly, once technology is developed, ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, still, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in contrast, in summary, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71066896212 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509333333333 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8758265568 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.6 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158270620524 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473205787039 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390019004225 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882533767842 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314700741914 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.