Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which y

This topic raises the controversial issue whether get informed about the past will not help people today's to make their decisions because they are not able to make connection between current events and past until there is some distance from both. Indisputably, the past achievements were not easy tasks or without basis. Therefore, I totally disagree that people will not get benefits from the knowing the past. Hence, this essay will illustrate my reasons and examples clearly.

To begin with, it is irrefutable the role of history or the vivid impact of history in our today's life. On one hand, past knowledge and theoretical innovation process are the basis of current study. On striking example, we have all the facts about the flying mechanisms and by using the past knowledge we build up a real models such as planes. Further, the past science is guiding for significant scientific researches.

Furthermore, the second vital point that should be taken into consideration the past success and failure is very useful. We can learn from their success stories while avoiding the failure one. Then, we can analysis their mistakes, find solutions and build up strong decisions. In addition, by deeper understanding we require in the past the more sagacious decisions we make in the present.

Last but not least, the contrary point of views states we cannot link between past and present until have distance from both, but this claim means that the both events became from the past with different time line, and cannot hold their assumption depends on weak point.

In conclusion, due to aforementioned reasons and examples knowing the past events is a very crucial part of our present. Thus, we can learn from their success experiences, avoid the bad one, advance the current life and widen the horizon for our understanding.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 302.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08278145695 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6248505401 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9686922584 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.483181242389 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134665100147 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122795112666 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24499035 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0929862003846 0.0667264976115 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.