Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today. Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.
People have been found perplexing over the past incidents to elicit at least somewhat essential to be linked to the current situations to make unerring decisions for themselves. Ideally, one cannot just ignore the facts from the past while taking decisions in present situations, but one cannot always link them with the current or futuristic events, which might take some new dimensions to resolve. The prompt here suggests that, knowing the facts from the past, not necessarily they must be perfectly epitome to the situation, precludes one to make decisions in current situations unless one has some kind of urbane connection between the past and present situations that is being implied on him. I strongly disagree to this claim that connection is a must for taking decisions for two reasons.
To begin with, past experiences have been the boon, though bane at times, in taking decisions for the current situations. This allows one to actually gather information, however linked to them or not, and implicate to the current situations. Furthermore, efficacy comes with experience to some extent- which means experiences from the extrapolation from the past events make one urbane which helps him make decisions. For example, a colonel of the army might not have the chance to participate in the wartime situations, but he might be able to extract some valuable information from the past wars to actually use them on the current dilapidated situations. The above example illustrates the importance of past events to make decisions for the present events such as being urbane and empirical without the particiaption in both events might help one make perfect decisions.
Secondly, it is not exacting to take part in both situations to actually make an essential decision rather it's good to be efficient in a way that is unprecedented to one so that he or she can make decisions. One era's zeitgeist is different from the other one's era, and this signfies the importance of past events so that one can extract data from that and utilize on the present, somewhat related, situations. For example, Nuclear mishaps have been very intimidating from the 1980s through 2000s, and this has led us to many precautionary measures to actually prevent them beforehand. Disasters then were unprecedented to all are now a simple thing to prevent just because the past experiences. This aforementioned example states that, one might not have a distance from both the events, but one can prevent some presentiments by applying the esoteric knowledge, which he or she gained through linking the past and present events whilst not particiapting in both.
One might argue that one should not take any decisions in current events if he does not have any experience in past similar events. But, is not that why we have a saying that goes "Everything has a beginning." Sometimes, the situation demands some pristine solution to the problems and, for that reason, an extraction from the past might be a helping hand to solve the problem provided that the events must be germane to each other. To sum up, One can make decisions about the present scenario to some extent, if he or she has some kind of germane knowledge about the then-problems form the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for taking decisions for two reasons. To begin with, past experien...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
... To begin with, past experiences have been the boon, though bane at time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ight help one make perfect decisions. Secondly, it is not exactin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 691, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...imple thing to prevent just because the past experiences. This aforementioned example states tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts whilst not particiapting in both. One might argue that one sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, at least, for example, kind of, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2725.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 538.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06505576208 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8466492687 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.449814126394 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5043666295 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.294117647 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6470588235 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393135587318 0.243740707755 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138231257488 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705543307332 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261262945743 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439042350991 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.