Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system. Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
The issue that laws and the legal systems cannot solve many problems of modern society is a contentious one. As laws govern people, and the legal system punishes people for not following a rule, I believe that they solve or avoid most of the problems.
First, If there are no laws that can govern people, there would be more problems. People cannot lead a peaceful life if there are no laws to guide them. For example, if there is no law against stealing, everyone may consider stealing as acceptable, and there will be chaos in society. One more example would be about telling lies. If there is no law against telling lies, people can get false evidence, and criminals can escape from the judiciary. So, I think laws are required to avoid many problems in society.
Second, if there is no legal system to punish criminals, there would be hazardous implications on society. Criminals would not be afraid of indulging in immoral activities if there is no legal system which will have negative implications on society. For example, if there is no legal system, a murderer would not be afraid of killing a president, and a thief would not be scared of robbing which would result in chaos. Therefore, I think the legal system is required and has avoided many problems in society.
On the other hand, someone can argue that punishing cannot change the people’s mind. Because punishing people for not following a rule can result in some cases, it may not change their minds always. Although the point is correct, we do not have an alternative solution always. For example, if there is a criminal who is notorious for his crimes, punishing may not be useful in changing his mind. However, I do not think there is an alternative for punishing in this case because we can not follow a customised rule for every case. If there is a direct alternative for punishing which can change people’s mind from indulging in immoral activities, we can follow that. Furthermore, because of the laws and legal system people can restrain themselves from unethical activities which avoid many problems.
Also, someone may further argue that the principles and guidelines can be included in a religion which can guide an individual instead of formal laws. Including principles into a religion can motivate most of the people but, we can not assume that everyone following a religion would follow the principles included in it. For example, if we have incorporated ten thousand principles into a religious book as the guidelines, we cannot conclude that everyone who has read the book would follow every principle in it. Furthermore, as long as there is no legal system which can punish them for not following a rule, it is impossible for anyone to follow all the principles. Hence, I think although laws and the legal system can not solve or avoid all the problems, we can not rule them out.
In conclusion, as laws govern people, the legal system punishes people for not following a rule, I believe that they solve or avoid most of the problems. Because they can not change people's mind always, we can not conclude that they can not solve all the problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...me cases, it may not change their minds always. Although the point is correct, we do n...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
... we do not have an alternative solution always. For example, if there is a criminal wh...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 191, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put before the verb 'mind'.
Suggestion: always mind
...ms. Because they can not change peoples mind always, we can not conclude that they can not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 38.0 12.4196629213 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2616.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 541.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83548983364 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62119852968 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.345656192237 0.4932671777 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 830.7 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 15.0 3.10617977528 483% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1162271362 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8076923077 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 23.0 5.13820224719 448% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262114352549 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108156659917 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986231489427 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19483625122 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111704436738 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.