Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.
Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In modern world, efficacy of laws have always been a central topic for our society. Therefore, this is a claim that problems in today's world are incapable to be solved by laws and legislative system, because laws lack powers to change human's internal wills. From my perspective of view, it is undeniably true that morality laws can't necessary cast decisive influence on people's personal life. Following this logic, we can't expect morality laws to achieve better society by calibrating personal freedom. However, when turning to business fields, morality laws could play a more fundamental and irreplaceable role.
To start off, I have to express my appreciation for the reason part of this issue. That is to say, morality laws can't reshape human's personal life, since people can always be able to circumvent laws, which ultimately gives way to more lenient laws consistent with their favorable life. The failure of American teetotalism and legislation is a case in point, which initially enforced a harsh forbidden alcohol abuse for men but finally turn in vain as proliferation of surreptitious bargains. Furthermore, we gradually learns from history, as aptly demonstrated by recognition of same-sex partnership and acceptance of physician-assisted suicides. In short, all of the past experience informs us that putting personal desire into cage of morality laws simply doesn't work.
Furthermore, so far as construction of greater society via impinging on personal freedom is concerned, the claim of the issue is of no doubt untenable, because their costs would predictably outweigh relevant benefits. For example, those who advocate criminalization of drugs use might cites various detrimental for their stance: increasing citizen violence, endangered people's health status and diminished addicts for medical usage. However, those defenders neglect the truth that such restriction doesn't prevent or even deter, from frequency of substance abuse. Inversely, it compel the addictive to undertake surreptitious sales via illegal channel, or even steal from medicine providers. In this sense, the anticipated risks definitely overshadow benefits that we can gain from.
However, when it comes to business world, I have to concede that morality laws is necessary for us to avoid detrimental influences of enterprises casting on every citizen. It is determined by avaricious nature of business that enterprise tend to act on behave of profits, rather than on the part of public interest. Consequently, business men might dare to risk public benefits if such decision could bring about them huge profit return. Such example abounds in our surrounding world. For instance, even if modern technologies already well serve to tackle with pollutants and make them innocuous for environment, business owners of factories, which generated deleterious wastes, still refuse to invest with equipment shipped with such capacity. Because this could undertake additional expenditure and inevitably diminish their ultimate revenue. Therefore, without mandatory regulation from government, we can't imagine that they would involuntarily sacrifice their profits and cater to public interest. From this perspective, only morality laws, which enunciates and imposes restrictions on business behaviors, could avoid those mercenaries to deteriorate our society unfetteredly.
In summary, while I accept with the reason part of this issue and the aforementioned claim seems applicable for personal domain, extending such practice to business world could further lead to negative results for public duty. That is to say, morality laws pale its significance in term of more personal domain, but they are still capable to preclude business stains to unfetteredly influence on our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 329, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t is undeniably true that morality laws cant necessary cast decisive influence on pe...
^^^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...personal life. Following this logic, we cant expect morality laws to achieve better ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...is issue. That is to say, morality laws cant reshape humans personal life, since peo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 519, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...ous bargains. Furthermore, we gradually learns from history, as aptly demonstrated by ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... physician-assisted suicides. In short, all of the past experience informs us that putting...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 669, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...assisted suicides. In short, all of the past experience informs us that putting personal desire...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 759, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...esire into cage of morality laws simply doesnt work. Furthermore, so far as constru...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...neglect the truth that such restriction doesnt prevent or even deter, from frequency o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'compels'?
Suggestion: compels
...uency of substance abuse. Inversely, it compel the addictive to undertake surreptitiou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: ON_BEHAVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'on behalf' (in the name of, as a representative of)?
Suggestion: on behalf
...of business that enterprise tend to act on behave of profits, rather than on the part of ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 906, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...andatory regulation from government, we cant imagine that they would involuntarily s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in short, in summary, no doubt, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3203.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62917398946 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9980776991 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 322.0 215.323595506 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565905096661 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 1023.3 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7921075068 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.12 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.76 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.48 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158500021852 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426566293726 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499490460353 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971398660001 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551046909391 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 182.0 100.480337079 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.