Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.
Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In today’s world, trait of altruism seems to be long gone because of frequent incidents of perfidy or homicide due to jealousy. For instance, the government of nepal which had strong relations with India started interfering into internal matters and shaking hands with the nemesis of India. Despite such incidents ruling all over media, there seems some ray of hope with the presence of personalities like Ratan Tata who have generously donated for the welfare of people.
But can all these charitable actions done by influential people truly be deemed as altruistic? No. Many of the charities opened up by stars and big companies are simply for attracting more and more people to their product with the ultimate aim of increasing their own worth. For instance, Actor Salman Khan is know to run a lot of charities and support them with the help of his hard earned money in film industry. But the truth is, he has been advised to do this to portray himself as philanthropist and evade the hit-and-run charges and killing of endangered black buck species. He is also known to have engaged with underworld gang like Dawood for his own personal interests. Therefore, even these seemingly good works by influential people can be specious and might be just like a veneer to hide their clandestine works.
Some people argue against the claim that professions like teachers or doctors are sacred and the people who choose such fields do simply for the fun of serving people. Doctors spend majority of their life studying and mastering various subjects in order to correctly diagnose and treat their patients. They accept fees as part of feeding and maintaining their clininc and home. Teachers also impart their knowledge and experience to the students for the betterment of student’s future. They do it with no avarice since they are not stakeholders of the future of their students.
However, the professions considered as sacred has now been polluted with devious methods opted by various institutions to attract more people and earn more money. These altruistic tasks has now been converted to money minting jobs, making owners richer and more powerful. For example, Allen career coaching institute, inarguably one of the biggest coaching centres for preparing students for IIT-JEE entrance exam has been reported to have involved in money laundering cases and buying top ranks to showcase their success. With the acquired money, Allen buys top teachers from across the country, rendering the previous students studying under that teacher helpless and forcing them to buy their courses with costs hefty fees. Therefore, even the sacred task of teaching has been corrupted by power of money.
In view of above examples and arguments, it is evident that work done by people is not independent of their own self interest. It is the foundation of carrying out any task, be it charitable task or engaging in activities that were considered to be pious. Though, there still is hope if common people start denouncing these devious acts and start bringing up altruistic people for carrying out tasks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
| 2021-11-05 | amyabt | 58 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Sumanayana | 50 | view |
| 2020-11-04 | yomi idris | 58 | view |
| 2020-09-23 | invisible_string | 75 | view |
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment Within that group of people 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots had not been wear 51
- Claim No act is done purely for the benefit of others Reason All actions even those that seem to be done for other people are based on self interest Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the rea 92
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely align 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...rth. For instance, Actor Salman Khan is know to run a lot of charities and support t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...earn more money. These altruistic tasks has now been converted to money minting job...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 510.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07647058824 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59462150339 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560784313725 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 780.3 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6223924555 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.681818182 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200471602154 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564174900168 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403949115898 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111337069718 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331363706672 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.