Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business
matters.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In
developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples
that could be used to challenge your position.
Government has limited source on issues of local and private businesses. Some countries have an economy dependent on foreign investments with private businesses instead of dependent on national businesses. I agree with the statement that government should fund local businesses other than private and foreign capital based in order to have more independency in economy, low prices.
Firstly, governments should always be supporting to local businesses which have disadvantage of less market power and reputation since people rarely tend to experience new small brands. In the lightening of this, government should give subsidy small business for advertisements and distribution in order to spread their names, refinements and reach different places. Government should not give capitulation to large private business which have already cogent client groups. For an illustration, Turkish government in 1970 has started a subsidy policy in tin sector, until this point, this sector is immensely based on imports, following this policy has leaded to decrease in prices and dramatically cut in imports of tins, consequently a decrease in clothes followed this. This proves that national economy is bolstered against foreign private businesses with some interventions.
Secondly, high volume of local production get rid of a country from its bounds to foreign economies and gives incentive for more entrepreneurships. For example, KOBI fund in Turkey is a fund offered by banks for small business entrepreneurs which enable them to proceed their new economical ideas and predicted opportunities. This prevents high prices and manifested regulations connected to oligopolies of private firms, accordingly, economy enhances with new adaptive innovation in the aim of less costs and independence from abroad investments.
On the other hand, some private business has tremendous comparative advantage in some sectors due to their natural resources or acknowledged technical advancement so that it is reasonable to take into account for government budget. For instance, Russia has serious low costs in natural cost compared to other countries, hence, it is not apt to play minimal role in negotiation with these private firms.
In conclusion, all things considered, positive drawback of local small businesses exceed negative drawbacks, therefore, in the aim of improvement of economy, government should play minimal role and should not give priority to private business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icy has leaded to decrease in prices and dramatically cut in imports of tins, con...
^^
Line 4, column 495, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun costs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...h new adaptive innovation in the aim of less costs and independence from abroad inve...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70923913043 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08331723437 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551630434783 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6560364519 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.071428571 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7857142857 5.21951772744 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221494516221 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882936666829 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543716254575 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128823722798 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436341982064 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.1639044944 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.