Claim: People who say they are bored should look inward rather than blaming the circumstances in which they find themselves.
Reason: Boredom arises from a lack of imagination and self-motivation.
Boredom arises from a lot of factors that cannot all be stated but I think it depends on the person in question. What entertains one person may bore another. Aside blaming boredom on circumstances, boredom can be created by one's self if only he or she allows it. I agree to the assertion that lack of imagination and self-motivation can lead to boredom.
First of all, boredom can be killed if one decides to do things for himself or herself. For instance, not depending on other people to make you happy is a sure way to keep boredom at bay. When an individual always depends on a particular friend to be happy, the absence of the person makes a huge impact. Blaming boredom on circumstances become inevitable but that should not always be the case. If one enjoys doing an activity with the friend he or she can try doing that activity alone. In most cases it happens the person enjoys it than he expected to.
Also, there is the notion that boredom is created when those you feel okay with are absent and when circumstances do not seem right. It is possible for a person to be at a social gathering and still be bored. I can attest to this and it mostly happens when you do not feel like you belong. Looking inward requires careful study of oneself, making sure to point out the things that make you happy. As a scenario, my sister is a sanguine and it is known that a sanguine do not easily get bored-which is somewhat true. It turns out in school most of her classmates avoided her because they thought she was a nerd and did not like company. It bothered her and made her bored most of her school days. She realized she liked music when she became a teenager and since then it did not bother her when her friends avoided her because she had countered her boredom with what she enjoys. In a nutshell, finding what you like is key to assuage boredom.
Additionally, it has come to note that if your boredom is from being with people you do not like, it is mostly possible you can entertain yourself with an electronic device. It is rare for there to be the absence of the two. There are also instances where one can explore his or her likes; going to the park alone to watch nature, starting an activity like painting etc. In most cases, the discovery made is refreshing.
One may argue that, lack of money will mean one cannot afford things to entertain himself. Believe it or not, it is in rare cases that the absence of people coincide with the absence of technology or something to entertain.
It seems cogent that boredom can be blamed on circumstances we find ourselves but exploring and looking into oneself does mystery. Leonardo Da'vinci might attest to what I am saying. By exploring activities one tends to find unimaginable things.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, so, still, then, for instance, i think, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 33.0505617978 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2263.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.526 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49753398375 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7464676434 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8214285714 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153373783289 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449541373347 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455154676945 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851223994557 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473140440295 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 12.1639044944 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.