Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Conducting a research and predicting the output is a common yet unreliable process which leaves us in uncertainty of the results factual accuracy. Experimentation in new fields of research without any expectation may sometime lead to unknown but desireable results.
Limiting a research in a specific field were we have found acceptable results may lead to stagnation of knowledge in that perticular area and might be that the case that no conclusive application was found on the further investment of time on the research work. To give an example, it is proven that an efficiency of a petrol engine is about 53 percent( It gives out about 53% of the input energy as output). Many researchers have spent a consideracle amount of time of their lives to increase the efficiency of the Petrol Engine, but it proved to be futile
In many cases, and advanced application from the already investigated areas which may not be applied in the current level of technologies present around us. To clarify this case,it is proven that Carbon fibre (A composite material made of Carbon Nanopaticles) is material which has higher strength than metals in some cases. The brake system of a car made using a carbon fibre brake disc has a better better potentail to deccelerate the vehicle yet the surrounding components needed for this technology to work smoothly are not capable enough to work harmoniously with the carbon brake discs
Researching in vidid areas may bring us in limelite of some unknows facts of the known areas of research. Continuing on the example of the Petrol Engine, when researchers decided to couyple the engine with a motor , they came to realisation of the fact that using enegry that is descipated through varuous means and storingb them in a form of electricity my directly give rise to efficiency of the Petrol engine.
Not Discounting the fact that we have a pre-research base for an already studied field, it helps us take a step forward in the exestential research work but it will not confirm you results, to give an example for this, Researchers have been scrating their heads on the possible application of string theory have a pre base of many years of research. It still has bore no fruits of success for the field.
To Conclude, In opine for not being stagnated on one area of research and explore other fields to conclusivly sutdy the pre researched field or find alternative solution for the application purpose.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...own but desireable results. Limiting a research in a specific field were we have found ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... present around us. To clarify this case,it is proven that Carbon fibre A composite...
^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: better
...e using a carbon fibre brake disc has a better better potentail to deccelerate the vehicle ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cided to couyple the engine with a motor , they came to realisation of the fact th...
^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bored', 'born', 'borne'.
Suggestion: bored; born; borne
...of many years of research. It still has bore no fruits of success for the field. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 17, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (In) must be used with a third-person verb: 'opines'.
Suggestion: opines
...ccess for the field. To Conclude, In opine for not being stagnated on one area of ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e solution for the application purpose.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, in many cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91525423729 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83713518192 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523002421308 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 23.0359550562 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.8075006705 60.3974514979 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.545454545 118.986275619 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5454545455 23.4991977007 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23548161014 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878149721307 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474147882734 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125356984286 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322009574492 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 14.1392134831 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 12.1743820225 145% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 11.2143820225 150% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.