Claim: Though often considered an objective pursuit, learning about the historical past requires creativity.
Reason: Because we can never know the past directly, we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts, documents, and artifacts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which the claim is based.
History is one such part of our life that we can not change even if we want to, and at the same time, holds a great significance too. I agree with the stated claim that the learning of the historical past requires creativity though it is often considered an objective pursuit.
As a child, or even later in our adulthood, we generally tend to relate the history to numbers or some data. For instance, the date of birth of some emperor, or the era in which the mesopotamia civilization happened, and so on. This is just a small glimpse of the actual importance of the historical past, just like only a small portion or tip of huge iceberg is visible. History requires a great deal of creativity to join the multiple broken pieces to derive or materialize a solid evidence which is often of great significance to the ongoing or future human activities.
Starting with, I remember watching the movies like " Da Vinci Code" or " Treasure Hunt", which nicely potrayed the meticulous process in acquiring the historical data and evidences to prove or find something substantial. Though based on fiction, I found the visualization of the data hunting in these pictures very thrilling and gave me an idea how tough it can really be to extract something that was buried or disguised over thousands or millions of years. Had it been a single lapse in the sequence, the whole campaign to find a certain piece of evidence would have gone completely wayward. In many cases, it also required the protagonists to display a great deal of improvisation and creativity, because everying can not go as per the text book rules when it comes to exploration.
Also, we often hear in the news about the extraction of data from the ancient letters that are written in obscure languages. Though they look deminutive to us, they hold a great value in term of tracking back of our civilization and it requires several days, months, and even years of rigorous imaginations and interpretations to extract those informations. Most of us have seen movies and documentaries related to the dinosours and ancient ice age. We cannot even imagine the effort it takes to imagine and accurately assume the shape, size and behavoir of such gigantic animals which existed millions of years ago, based on just some fossils and residual skeletons. There are myriad of cases where the imaginations and hard work of geologists and archeologists have yielded marvellous results in the field of climate change, geology and human history.
Thus, i strongly agree that the study of historical past is not confined within the objective informations, but require a great deal of creativity and meticulous procedures to extract valuable information that help us in improving our present and future life experiences in many ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 806, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ook rules when it comes to exploration. Also, we often hear in the news about th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, really, so, thus, for instance, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2332.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9406779661 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87115279731 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552966101695 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2470304632 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.75 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256025094268 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782802094045 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102971099033 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153262414231 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106201921508 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.