Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.
Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Education is the birthright of all human beings, irrespective of gender, race, and culture. Educators are merely facilitators which imparts knowledge. The statement states that educators should consider the interest and suggestion made by the students and include them in curriculum, because this will motivate students to learn and be intrested in studies. I agree with the claim mention above, however by just including the subjects would not garentee that the students would be motivated. There are many factors which decides the motivation of the students to learn and study a particular subject. More on this points would be discuss in the following essay.
In today's fast-paced world, where talent is highly valued, it is crucial to persue careers in which one has mastery. One can only become a master when his basis are strong, he has received latest knowledge about the subjects, and one has motivation and will power to be consistent and study deligently. For instance, if one has decided that he wants to pursue a career in Data Science then the person should study subjects which would help him in becoming one. The schools and colleges should include various subjects which teaches a person on how to become a Data Scienctist. They should teach different subjects like, Python progamming, data handling, big data, and many more. If the educators inbclude all these in their courses then student would feel that he is studying about subjects which would help him in future and he would be motivated and inclined to study that subjects with more motivation and deligience.
The educators should teach more on partical knowledge than theoretical knowlwedge. This would make the students more industrial ready once they passed out. If the educators only teach theoretical knowledge and no practical then the students might not be able to relate and understand the textbook knowledge. For instance, lets say that college A after taking suggestion from the students, started including practical training as they were not able to relate to the theory, whereas college B does not do this and teaches theory, then the students passed out from college A would be more effecient as they have actually work on the machine.
However, the educators should also see that all the suggestion provided by the students should not be inlcuded. A proper analysis should be done before including the subjects to the course. Educators should see that are these subects valid in the industry and how much benefit would a student have from studying them.
In conclusion, when planning courses educators should be malliable and include subjects which are suggested by the student. This would allow the students to be more motivated and be keen to learn more about the subject and they would enjoy learning and not feel stress about it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 610, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...and study a particular subject. More on this points would be discuss in the followin...
^^^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'received the latest'.
Suggestion: received the latest
...aster when his basis are strong, he has received latest knowledge about the subjects, and one h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, then, whereas, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09698275862 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56651175194 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456896551724 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5848924569 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.619047619 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316559280576 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10821488647 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070498455826 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202923261762 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527208855605 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.