College and university education should be free for all students, fully financed by the government.
Nowadays, expensive tuition of college and university has burdened lots of family. Some people may argue that the tuition should be paid by the governments to relieve the financial issues of their citizens. From my point of view, I believe that governments should offer free education charge to people who have financial problems, but not to all students.
Students who are not as wealthy as others may need to find part time jobs during their semesters to support the expensive tuition. However, doing so may decrease the efficiency of studying and may even reduce the desire of students to study. For example, students who are poor often leave their parents, and live solely outside their hometown in order to study at the universities they want. The whole family have to squeeze as much money as possible to afford the tuition fees and high living expense in big cities. As a result, those students often find part time jobs to earn more money to abate the heavy burden of their family. They will not have as much time to study as other students who do not need to find part time jobs. If governments offer college and university free of charges can make those students have more time to study.
Some people may argue that it is a waste to offer free education charge, and will consequently burden the financial of the country. Still, it is not correct since it can be a great investment in the students who are talented. Talented students who have financial problems may overlook their own talents because they cannot find out their talents during studying at colleges. They may invent some revolutionary products in the future and results in an economic growth in the future. Thus, investing in students who do not have the ability to afford the tuition is not a waste but a worthy investment.
Nevertheless, some may claim that free use of educational resources will results in a waste by students. Indeed, people often waste things that they did not spend money on it. Therefore, governments should only sponsor the students who really have financial issues. For instance, governments can set up a method of classification of wealth to determine whether a student are really poor or not. By doing so, governments can offer them university free of charge to encourage them to keep on study. Those who do not have financial issues should pay the tuition by themselves in order to avoid waste on educational resources.
To sum up, sponsorships of college and university tuition by governments should be offered to students who cannot afford costly tuition fees, but not to all students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...t as wealthy as others may need to find part time jobs during their semesters to support ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... As a result, those students often find part time jobs to earn more money to abate the he...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 717, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... other students who do not need to find part time jobs. If governments offer college and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
... free use of educational resources will results in a waste by students. Indeed, people ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, really, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2160.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88687782805 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61194661223 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432126696833 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.1725917468 60.3974514979 38% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1818181818 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285055628714 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945101889341 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759285708408 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204591275671 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759057000746 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.