College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
The claim presented by the author that the college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field is partially correct. Like a coin has two sides similarly this motion also carries another side of it. We will walk through both sides of this claim in the further passage.
Although it is necessary to have knowledge of future job availability to select the field of study is a fair choice, but no one could predict what the situation will be in the future. For instance, a decade ago many students in India chose IT(Information Technology) as their field of study. But, as those students who were in great demand back then had to face job recession. The main reason for this was the saturation in that field, also the whole structure of the IT field had transformed due to technical advancements. Thus, what was in demand before was not asked for in present. In this period only those were able to survive who upgraded themselves and had a real interest in that field. Hence, it is essential for the students to explore their field of interest before making this crucial decision, on which their future is based.
As said, It is more important for a student to select the choice of field in which he is interested, as then only he will enjoy his work and do it more passionately. For instance, if a student chooses to pursue his education in Computer science field just because there is the likelihood of job availability in future in this field, and in reality, he has an interest in a different field. If he somehow manages to get a job, but will not be better than the one who exceptionally has an interest in this field. Thus to excel in a particular field, it is important for the students to choose the field of study which draws his interest and he seems curious to explore it.
In contrast, completely moving with the flow is not a good option. Many students think they are interested in a particular field but are not totally aware of the field and the job market in the future; they are bound to make a cursory choice of choosing one before knowing about it. For instance, there are many students who choose a field of study according to the choices made by most of their friends, but it is really essential for such students to get proper guidance of the future aspect of that field. Ultimately, they have to earn money so if they are not aware of their passion and interests they should consult a counsellor who could guide them with the same. Just studying for years and investing a huge amount of time and money on such education which could not even return the money spent over it is not at all a fair choice.
In conclusion one must note, it is important to know the situation of the job market in future plays a vital role to select the field of study only for those who are not aware of their future goals and interests. But for those students who are aware of their passion and interests should not base their choice of field of study on such contentions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 462, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...that field, also the whole structure of the IT field had transformed due to technical ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...eld, also the whole structure of the IT field had transformed due to technical advanc...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 838, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cision, on which their future is based. As said, It is more important for a stud...
^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...tionally has an interest in this field. Thus to excel in a particular field, it is i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, similarly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2473.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 552.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48007246377 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47060472504 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.402173913043 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5135981431 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.761904762 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503663764128 0.243740707755 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173983110299 0.0831039109588 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172520181535 0.0758088955206 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327257902078 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423302997661 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 48.8420337079 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.