Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Should universities and colleges require all faculty to spend time working outside their academic field in profession relevant to the courses they teach? I strongly concede with the speaker assertion spending few amount of time in their relevant subject matters provide vivid glance of their course study on one hand while on the other hand they will be update with the recent changes taking around the world regarding their subject matters.
The first reason for my agreement with the speaker is that providing justifiable time outside the course study in their field of study make them far more competent and up to date with the changes going on around the world. For instance, when the universities and colleges lecturer are bound with their academic only make them completely dump and insane. On doing so, students never get chance to be enhance with the recent changes within their relative field. Thus, complete study of their field will become void and progress on their subject matter will get obscured. Therefore, every universities and colleges should definitely enhance their teaching staff to be familiar with the changes going on around the world.
The second reason why I support the assertion is that providing and supporting lectures and professors to be in touch outside the academic world provide enormous benefits to their students. While doing so, students will be strongly motivated so as to know about the noble changes in their field. This will buttress their field of study and hence, different radical improvements can be obviously seen in their subject. As a result, prosperity and development of nation can be institutionalized. Moreover, after the completion of study, students can easily settled their life with proper jobs and salary in this competitive world. Hence, it is the prime duty of different academic zones to render their faculties to spend time outside the field of study.
Some may argue that spending quality time outside the academic during the academic tenure will definitely hamper the quality of education. For instance, it is the responsibility of institutions to finish their courses within time but rendering professional during the academic tenure cut off the valuable time of the students. Hence, students will be indolent and will be embarrassed. Moreover, only providing information outside the academic courses make them obtuse and hence at last, they will be far away from their subjects matters. Thus, at first theoretical knowledge regarding the subject matters is to be provided. However, this point is flawed since providing theoretical knowledge of their courses will hinder them from the practical ideas. Therefore, both sort of theoretical and practical based teaching ideas should be provided to the students so that they will be relaxed while facing the competitive world.
In sum, teaching faculties should allocate extra work out in the academic tenure so that they can provide balanced and sustainable teaching pattern which can benefits their students during teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'few amounts'.
Suggestion: few amounts
...ede with the speaker assertion spending few amount of time in their relevant subject matte...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...so, students will be strongly motivated so as to know about the noble changes in their f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...e outside the field of study. Some may argue that spending quality time outside the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
... sustainable teaching pattern which can benefits their students during teaching.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, sort of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 483.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30020703934 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62892840694 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430641821946 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5914528244 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.904761905 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296035479721 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113233324579 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177117564524 0.0758088955206 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210319162342 0.150359130593 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129094617485 0.0667264976115 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.