The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no more than two or three days per week. Despite receiving less frequent homework assignments, Marlee students earn better grades overall and are less likely to be required to repeat a year of school than are students in Sanlee. These results call into question the usefulness of frequent homework assignments. Most likely the Marlee students have more time to concentrate on individual assignments than do the Sanlee students who have homework every day. Therefore teachers in our high schools should assign homework no more than twice a week.
In these meme, the author recommends that the teacher of Sanlee high school should assign less homework assignments like as the teacher of Marlee so as to improve the quality of education. To bolster the recommendation, the author cites the following cites about the teaching methods of Marlee: (1) students of Marlee are gaining better grades overall and are less likely to repeat a year of school than are students in Sanlee (2) Marlee students have enough time to concentrate on individuals assignments than do students of Sanlee who have homework everyday. Close scrutiny of each of these facts however reveals that none of them lend no credible evidence to support the recommendation.
First, the argument readily assumes that giving less homework assignments had increased the overall grades of the students of Marlee. Thus, this assumption interpreted by the author is absolutely wrong as he forgot to mention the different teaching methods undertaken by the administrative departments of that schools. Therefore, to improve the results by Sanlee high school, the appropriate teaching methodologies should be studied at first and then applied. Thus, the author fails to mention the accurate methods and technique taken by Marlee high school.
Secondly, the author could have been much clearer if the author vividly studied about the nature of teaching faculties hired by the Marlee school. The reason behind this is that only providing less homework assignments to the students of Sanlee doesn't adequately improve their performance. Hence, the administration of Sanlee high school should be reluctant on enforcing qualified candidates at school so as to boost their results. Thereby, the argument sights no viable evidence to buttress the recommendation.
Finally, the argument fails to mention one of the key factors on the basis of which it could have been evaluated, giving fewer assignments doesn't in reality improve the results of Marlee high school. Therefore, the administrative personnel of Sanlee high school should studied the different pattern applied by the Marlee high school. Moreover, what sort of teaching atmosphere obtained by Marlee high school should also be studied as providing excessive homework will pressurized the students and provide less time to concentrate on education. Likewise, while giving less homework assignments provide surplus time for students to concentrate on outward activities. Therefore, the author remains unsubstantiated and become open to debate.
To sum up, the author relies on dubious assumptions that renders unconvincing as it stands. To bolster the recommendation, the author should provide clear evidence; perhaps by a local study or survey: different methods applied by Marlee high should be studied and should implemented in their school, highly qualified teaching departments should be enforced and different extra facilities should be installed so as to boost the students in education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this meme' or 'these memes'?
Suggestion: this meme; these memes
In these meme, the author recommends that the teacher...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...signments like as the teacher of Marlee so as to improve the quality of education. To bo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 548, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...do students of Sanlee who have homework everyday. Close scrutiny of each of these facts ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 558, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: Scrutiny
...s of Sanlee who have homework everyday. Close scrutiny of each of these facts however reveals ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...k assignments to the students of Sanlee doesnt adequately improve their performance. H...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nforcing qualified candidates at school so as to boost their results. Thereby, the argum...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...een evaluated, giving fewer assignments doesnt in reality improve the results of Marle...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 469, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'pressurize'
Suggestion: pressurize
...ed as providing excessive homework will pressurized the students and provide less time to c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 409, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nt extra facilities should be installed so as to boost the students in education.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, sort of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 55.5748502994 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2502.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 454.0 441.139720559 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51101321586 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9419463988 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429515418502 0.468620217663 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.76447105788 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0070984505 57.8364921388 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 119.503703932 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 23.324526521 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.70786347227 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176522522428 0.218282227539 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685124531617 0.0743258471296 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700912125369 0.0701772020484 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115066776743 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572356738808 0.0628817314937 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.3799401198 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.3550499002 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.197005988 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.5979740519 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 12.3882235529 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.9071856287 151% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.