Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The writer contends that colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academidc world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. I mostly agree with the writer's assertin, however in few realms it can deteriorate the whole teaching learning activities of the classroom.
First of all, in the sector such as Engineering and Agriculture, if a faculty work outside the academic field, he usuallly gets practical knowledge abundantly and develops cogent view regarding the subject. As we know, when a faculty has acute insight in a subject matter, only when he may deliver a concise knowledge to his students. For the supporting example, when I was teaching in university only, I didn't have much knowledge about the field, but after when I joined to the construction company as a part time engineer, I found that the practical knowledge has very much bolstered my insight knowledge. Gradually, my teaching had improved drastically and students were started to appreciate my insight about the subject.
Secondly, in the sector such as Agriculture, only the book knowledge is not sufficient to devlep the clear concept about the subject matter. One of my friend Ram, who was a agriculture graduate and was in a teaching profession. He also cites that, when he starded a part time job as a research assistant in a company related to his field, his knowledge and insight of the subject matter has significantly grown and was able to interpret in a lucid way to his students.
Thirdly, however, implementing such requirement in the field such as language teachin can deteriorate the teaching learning activities. For language teaching, a faculty should have strong proficiency on writing and interpreting it. In order to develp such proficiency, a faculty should spend more time on his preparation, when he works outside, he maynot get time to prepare, which results reduced quality of teaching learnig activites.
In sum, I mostly agree with the writer's assertion, however, in some case it can be counterproductive. So, it should be implemented for those realms in which it has optimum benefit, and not in those realms which has counterproductive outcoumes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'concise knowledge'.
Suggestion: concise knowledge
...ubject matter, only when he may deliver a concise knowledge to his students. For the supporting exa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 405, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...en I was teaching in university only, I didnt have much knowledge about the field, bu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...joined to the construction company as a part time engineer, I found that the practical kn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t matter. One of my friend Ram, who was a agriculture graduate and was in a teach...
^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
.... He also cites that, when he starded a part time job as a research assistant in a compan...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a lucid way" with adverb for "lucid"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...icantly grown and was able to interpret in a lucid way to his students. Thirdly, however, imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...tes. In sum, I mostly agree with the writers assertion, however, in some case it can...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05098214093 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515406162465 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1283904533 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296492873803 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109007463662 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199930031912 0.0758088955206 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179947892669 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187796512514 0.0667264976115 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.