Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
Comprehensive understanding of overall facts and information of one’s profession is necessary in today’s competitive world. One should be trained to face all possible problems that they might face in their work. Process of gaining absolute knowledge regarding our field starts right from college and university. Professors are the tutors who teach us how to take initial steps in the outside world. I completely agree with the statement’s assertion that faculty must spend time working outside the academic world.
Academics work as building blocks for the students. Hence, they should be trained in casting a bridge between the students and real world. Faculties without any industrial or practical experience cannot teach the student to be successful outside the classroom. For instance, a faculty in engineering college should have factory training and work experience so that he can acquaint the students with the pragmatic scenarios and train him for all plausible outcomes. A teacher who doesn’t have knowledge about the practical world will not be able to follow a fruitful didactic approach.
Also, when a teacher has few years of work experience, he is more valuable to the institute than an untrained professor with many years of teaching experience. Professor with appropriate training in the relevant field can not only guide the student professionally but also morally. He can educate him about working in a team harmoniously and all the right traits and attitude required to survive in the competitive sector. Professor should be up-to-date with all the new findings and developments taking place in the sector. For example, a professor of MBA course must also be working part-time in other firm to be aware of the latest advancements and changes in the market environment.
On the other hand, when all faculties are complied to work outside the university along with teaching the students; they can have a hard time keeping up with the hectic schedule. While, the teacher to student ratio in most universities is very less, most faculties are forced to teach more classes than they normally can. Extra training and work along with this work load would only burden them more, which might lead to inefficiency.
Hence, training programs for tutors should be schedules in such a way that it would not burden them and make them more efficient. By increasing the knowledge and experience of the professors only can we guarantee the overall development of their students. So, all faculties must spend time working outside academics in their germane courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me working outside the academic world. Academics work as building blocks for th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, regarding, so, while, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30024213075 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87609546863 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513317191283 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3663733764 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.238095238 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384234794245 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11029402784 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841120156226 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213848406281 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598329620146 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.