Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
From the authors perspective, a routine monitoring of all the employee email correspondence will protect the company from lawsuits, will save time and resources. A company's progress depends on all ranks of employees from top to bottom, a clear and efficient scrutiny of works can help the company to assure success. I disagree with the authors assumption.
First of all, a company's success or profit rate mostly depends on how it manages its resources, one can not state that by doing a particular thing or following a certain procedure will accelerate the company's overall success. In a company there may be various numbers of ranks or positions and everyone is responsible to guide their subordinates. Every workers results, ideas, outputs are gathered and his/her immediate boss is responsible for it. Thus, a company follows a command of chain where everyone's work/duty are being evaluated by someone routinely, after honestly maintain all of them assures a company's success.
Moreover, mostly all the established companies maintain lawsuit, it is a must to do other wise the company may fall in to great havoc. Suppose, a company's trade license is fraud and by using it the company might be able to achieve a great profit but when the story of license will be refuted then all the money will be taken by the authority. Then the company will be bankrupt.
In sum, by maintaining a routine check helps immediate advances of an employee but his/her total output must be exacting according to the needs and one group of higher rank employers
must scrutinize their work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
From the authors perspective, a routine monitoring of al...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... to assure success. I disagree with the authors assumption. First of all, a compan...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'result'.
Suggestion: result
...guide their subordinates. Every workers results, ideas, outputs are gathered and his/he...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...hed companies maintain lawsuit, it is a must to do other wise the company may fall in t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: OTHER_WISE_OTHERWISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'otherwise'?
Suggestion: otherwise
...es maintain lawsuit, it is a must to do other wise the company may fall in to great havoc....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and one group of higher rank employers must scrutinize their work.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, honestly, may, moreover, so, then, thus, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 262.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0534351145 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77388236987 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580152671756 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8680280319 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27421660484 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114764142903 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103247408332 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13660820361 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118100716554 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.