Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The management;s policies break or make any company's culture and its employess morale. Monitoring policies alone will not yield results until acted upon. We should also consider the types of emplyees that are working in any company before considering to implement such policies since such constriction could pave way to consitrict the creative work atmosphere.
Although the management's policy looks promising on the outset, it should consider the nuances when monitoring personal data. Employees spend significant amount of time in the office and may use their personal emails for the their personal work. Monitoring personal email would pose a threat to personal data infringement. the company has to delineate which correspondence it has to monitor. Keeping a keen eye on the correspondence done with the company's email will definitely give insights and may help the management in making further policies to guide the employees as to how to use the email and for what purposes. Monitoring the correspondences will definitely give insights as to how much time employees are spending on their personal emails and social network. Since time spent on the employees personal work in the company's time is a loss to the company, the management can take further actions as to specifying how much time the employess can spend on their personal emails and social networks.
Secondly, protection against the lawsuits by monitoring the email correspondence is definitely plausible. But just by monitoring data will not secure protection or yield shelter from attacks from the lawsuits. Such monitoring should further give way to reduce such emails as which might attract lawsuits. By flagging emails that are sent out using company's email should be regualarly monitored and such data should be archived or enwuire the empolyees as to what prompted them to send such emails.
Thirdly, the proliferation of the resources as time, servers, and company secret documents can be curbed by monitoring and further reducing such proliferation by appropriate policies. For companies these resources are always cost that would be added up in the product or the services that rendering. The monitoring phase should always be followed up with implementing such practices that reduce wastages. Practices as being concise in emails, or hosting a communication workshop for the employees that lack skills in communication would help in this endeavor. Furthermore, such implementation of should be followed with keen monitoring to ensure the proper practices are carried out.
One may argue that monitoring correpsondence would render the workspace atmosphere hostile. Creative work would always follow a freedom which the employees will always expect. On the other hand such policy, if implemented, would reather cause harm than render beneifits. It is imperative to study the types of employee that work in a company. Are they motivated enough? Do they need creative space? Or is the type of work just routinely? Taking these quesitons before making polices will help management to put forth right policies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considering implementing'.
Suggestion: considering implementing
... that are working in any company before considering to implement such policies since such constriction c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managements'' or 'management's'?
Suggestion: managements'; management's
...ative work atmosphere. Although the managements policy looks promising on the outset, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...e and may use their personal emails for the their personal work. Monitoring personal emai...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...a threat to personal data infringement. the company has to delineate which correspo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2614.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40082644628 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91476718943 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462809917355 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.0 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.1307710851 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8148148148 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9259259259 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.74074074074 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366090418515 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103319206179 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704258207091 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207236348873 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787370294214 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.