Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position
In this modern world, the employees of almost every company possess an e-mail which is solely given by the company. The employees communicate with people within and beyond the company using this particular e-mail id mostly for business purposes. The given issue prompt opines that the company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence to reduce the waste of company resources such as time and system capacity. Moreover, it suggests that adopting the given policy will protect the company from lawsuits. I strongly agree with the given statements. I think adopting the given policy will help the company in many ways.
To begin with, let's take into account the time issue first. If the employees of a company use the e-mail id while working in the office for their personal purposes such as - booking movie tickets, ordering goods online, emailing friends and families, chatting with people who are not related to the company in any possible ways etc., then it will be wastage of potential time of working hours. As a result, the efficiency of the employees with respect to time will decrease. Eventually, it will definitely affect the production rate of the whole company. So, if the company adopt the suggested policy, the management will get to know every detail of the e-mail ids of the employees and will be able to take necessary steps to avoid the wastage of time.
Moreover, It might be the case that an unscrupulous employee may leak the business policy and plans of a company to its other competing companies. If the competing companies of the market get to know about the business plans and policies of a particular company, it will more than harmful for the company. Again, if any employee tries to do an unethical transaction using the e-mail id of the company, it may cause great harm to the company. It may hamper the good name of the company and in case of serious offense, it may cause a ban by the government or the law enforcement agencies. So, to prevent these type of problems, the management should monitor the e-mail correspondence of every e-mail id of the employees.
Let's take the example of a company named Enosis Solutions in Bangladesh. The ICT division found that one of the employees of Enosis Solutions was trying to access the database of ICT division using the e-mail id given by the company. Later, the employee was taken to prison and sentenced to imprisonment for two years under the ICT law of Bangladesh. But, later the company had to face a lot of problems. It was shut down by Police and later maintaining a lot of formalities, the company again got the permission to run its business again in Bangladesh. If Enosis Solutions adopted the suggested the given policy in the statement before, it would not have to face any problems.
So, monitoring the e-mail correspondence of the employees will help a company in many ways.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...of every e-mail id of the employees. Lets take the example of a company named Eno...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, i think, such as, as a result, to begin with, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87701612903 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66977675046 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5968047191 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.173913043 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5652173913 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338211620964 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103213167261 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11671866859 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208535724874 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113815597267 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.