Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The above issue is a contentious one. The author states that company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondance which will help in reducing the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. The above issue is full of flaws for a plethora a reasons. I disagree with the author's point of view.
First of all, monitoring employee e-mail on regular basis may be a violation of employee's private life. If company regulary keeps on checking their mails than employees will be careful about that and will not send many important and private messages over e-mail. Due to this company's work can be frustrated. Even though routine monitoring of employees e-mail is done with a good intention the employees may feel that company lacks trust on them.This can also be the reason for company being stagnant.
Secondly, the author states that routine monitoring will protect company from lawsuits which is again a baseless assumption. To illustrate this, consider for example if there is an unscrupulus employee in the company and he/she know's that routine monitoring of e-mail takes place than the employee won't send any malicious message over e-mail. Nowadays, as the technology is progressing there are many different means by which the employee can leak company details. So in this case, routine monitoring will only waste company's time and resources and it won't save them.
Apart from this, if employees feel that they are being trusted and valued, than they will give more than 100% for the company. Lack of trust would make people unhappy. Thus it is rightly said that the success of any organization depends on it's employees. If the company
will show trust and confidence in its employees than the company will definitely achieve success.
Hence to conclude everything, I strong believe that routine monitoring of employee e-mail will do more bad than good for company's growth.Routine monitoring should be done only when all employees within a firm are willing to abide by the decision of company management of routine monitoring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...l as protect the company from lawsuits. The above issue is full of flaws for a plet...
^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a reason' or simply 'reasons'?
Suggestion: a reason; reasons
...e issue is full of flaws for a plethora a reasons. I disagree with the authors point of v...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o this companys work can be frustrated. Even though routine monitoring of employees e-mail ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...y feel that company lacks trust on them.This can also be the reason for company bein...
^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...the technology is progressing there are many different means by which the employee can leak co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ack of trust would make people unhappy. Thus it is rightly said that the success of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...depends on its employees. If the company will show trust and confidence in its em...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...any will definitely achieve success. Hence to conclude everything, I strong believ...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 40, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
... Hence to conclude everything, I strong believe that routine monitoring of employee e-m...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Routine
... more bad than good for companys growth.Routine monitoring should be done only when all...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, apart from, for example, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14121037464 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64424258891 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495677233429 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.1501749614 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.941176471 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470438322575 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153174307292 0.0831039109588 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175053347785 0.0758088955206 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259806674271 0.150359130593 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136366024494 0.0667264976115 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.