Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
The author here presents us with a point of view that nation should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. While I know that economic gain is an important aspect of society but so is preserving the wilderness in their natural state. Thus, I would agree with the author's opinion that nation should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gains.
First of all, the nation prioritizing the wilderness areas above economic gain is in itself a great cause. I would like to point out that if priority is given to given to preserving wilderness would mean that the wildlife and the natural aspects which are on the verge of extinction will be preserved. We won't be requiring any cloning techniques to clone the almost extinct species.Moreover, if priority is not given to preserve the wilderness areas than there would be a time when all the rare species would be extinct. Even now there are only 1411 tigers left in India. If economic gains are prioritized over preserving wilderness area than that time is not far enough when all the rare species would become extinct.
Furthermore, if the nation only considers economic gain than the entire environmental cycle would also get disturbed. Everyone is dependent on someone and if we reduce the wilderness areas than there could be many negative repucussions of the same.For example, even if one of the small species in life-cycle gets endangered than those dependent on those species will also face a lot of problem.Also cutting wilderness areas and building factories, industries would create a huge amount of pollution. This can be understood by taking into consideration the example that if factory is built by cutting the forest areas than first of all the level of natural oxygen will be reduced and secondly the factory emits harmful gases which will increase air pollution.
Admittedly, as each side has its own strengths and weaknesses I believe that only passing laws to preserve wildlife can also have some negative impact.This is true especially when it comes to the point of ever increasing population in the cities. In addition, if the population increases than people will need a place for stay and also to increase some amount of employment chances are that economic gain would be given priority. However the above argument does not constitute a sufficient support to claim that nation should not pass laws to protect the wilderness areas at the cost of economic gains.
To sum up, I truly believe that nation should pass laws to protect the remaining wilderness, even if these areas could be developed for economic gains. In fact, the necessity of making laws to preserve forest areas is the need of hour and if not given careful attention because of economic gains then the entire environmental life-cycle would get disturbed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ral state. Thus, I would agree with the authors opinion that nation should pass laws to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'given to'.
Suggestion: given to
...d like to point out that if priority is given to given to preserving wilderness would mean that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ues to clone the almost extinct species.Moreover, if priority is not given to preserve t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ere are only 1411 tigers left in India. If economic gains are prioritized over pre...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... many negative repucussions of the same.For example, even if one of the small speci...
^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of problems'.
Suggestion: a lot of problems
...pendent on those species will also face a lot of problem.Also cutting wilderness areas and build...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Also
...species will also face a lot of problem.Also cutting wilderness areas and building f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...species will also face a lot of problem.Also cutting wilderness areas and building f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...life can also have some negative impact.This is true especially when it comes to the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 431, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... economic gain would be given priority. However the above argument does not constitute ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nmental life-cycle would get disturbed.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in fact, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2487.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00402414487 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69346240104 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9134761207 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.4375 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0625 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5625 5.21951772744 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.604521729686 0.243740707755 248% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24252796126 0.0831039109588 292% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224860927 0.0758088955206 297% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.385377173022 0.150359130593 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238451038663 0.0667264976115 357% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.