Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The management suggests that the company should monitor all employee emails as it would protect the company from lawsuits. I strongly disagree with the argument due to the following reasons.
First of all, each person has the right to privacy and the company violates it by monitoring all the emails of its employees. This would lead to a sense of distrust of the company towards its employees. Privacy has become a major issue these days, which is evident by the recent scandalous case of Facebook. Wherein, the company sold its users' information to a third-party application. This case led to severe backlash from the government and lead to movements such as "boycott Facebook" worldwide. If the company too doesn't want a similar response from its employees and society, it must reconsider its decision to monitor its employees' emails.
Secondly, the argument is based on the reasoning that monitoring email correspondence would reduce resources such as time and system capacity. However, the management fails to see the additional resource utilization. The company would have to pay for monitoring applications along with their installation in all of its employees' devices. Or, the company would have to hire more people to monitor emails and flag them accordingly. Both of which would cost the company more money and reduce its profit margins.
And finally, the management's claim that monitoring emails would protect the company from lawsuits is not supported. The company would instead face more lawsuits from its employees for this decision. Instead of continuously monitoring the emails, in the case of a lawsuit, the company can check the email correspondence of the employee to serve as evidence.
In conclusion, the management's suggestion to monitor its all employee's emails is not supported by its argument. Instead of proving to be beneficial for the company, it would lead to additional costs and privacy violation lawsuits for the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ook' worldwide. If the company too doesnt want a similar response from its employ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managements'' or 'management's'?
Suggestion: managements'; management's
...rve as evidence. In conclusion, the managements suggestion to monitor its all employees...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 54, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
..., the managements suggestion to monitor its all employees emails is not supported b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31309904153 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93732049109 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476038338658 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.214965019 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.3888888889 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3888888889 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350588809319 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129394715738 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919251258516 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226048799015 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723631365079 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.