Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Monitoring and surveillance conducted across the organization is a factor that every organization relies on. In fact, it is uncommon for companies to do a systematic scan of all their resources and the technology used. The prompt recommends that firms not be lethargic in keeping track of outgoing and incoming e-mails. I strongly agree with this suggestion that companies do routine monitoring of employee e-mails to detect any inappropriate emails and protect them from any lawsuits or a virus.
To begin with, many employees misuse the mail system frequently. They send inappropriate emails to their colleagues and to their juniors and harass them in one way or another. For example, a senior employee has been assigned a task and instead of taking responsibility he or she is handing out it to a fresher or intern and threatening them to complete it as soon as possible or the reviews forwarded to HR will be not in the intern's favor. Further, managers could also offer female employees to do inappropriate tasks in return for bigger hikes and promotions. Such behavior and harassment should not be tolerated by anyone and if any such incidents should be stopped from its root and terminate the employee responsible for the same.
In addition, new technology has been developed where hackers sent a link through the mail and deploy a virus into the system. Businesses with sensitive information should be careful and have proper measures to avoid any information leaks. For instance, the government outsources many internal projects to different companies which requires a lot of sensitive and risky information. Many competitors being jealous or to destroy the reputation of their opponent hire hackers to get the information and reveal everything publicly. Such situations are highly possible due to new technology being developed every second and it should be stopped it protects the business from any lawsuits.
Of course, some argue that in our increasingly sophisticated environment employees could respect a sense of professionalism and trust from their firm. However, isn't that precisely why any employees should be professional and not misuse the assets given to them by the business? If they do so, they are likely to do the best job possible. Furthermore, monitoring every asset will help the company in growing bigger and have no bad reputation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rotects the business from any lawsuits. Of course, some argue that in our increa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ism and trust from their firm. However, isnt that precisely why any employees should...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 382.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20680628272 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00577484809 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55497382199 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8026192466 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240710570954 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686006936436 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596006481476 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144853042528 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481160074836 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.