Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The company management wants to implement a policy in which a conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence would be done. Further more management cited that this kind of policy would reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. This statement is marred by indiscriminate word choice which reduces the efficacy of the statement and renders the sentiment expressed superficial. The statement becomes marginal, opinionated and subjective in nature which reduces the clarity, potency and the sentiment expressed.
To begin with the use of word routine is polemical since it is a broad term which should be specified in above statement. Company suggest to conduct a routine monitoring of all employees e-mail correspondence but failed to specify the frequency of routine monitoring whether it is conducted too many times or only one time. Frequency of routine monitoring directly affects the working of employees for example, if the routine monitoring of e-mails conducted every day rather one or two times a month, this would ultimately annoy all the employees working in the company which further reduces their output thus all combined, efficiency of the company would greatly decrease. Therefore, frequency of conducting routine monitoring should be specified in above statement.
Additionally, it can be argued that conducting a routine monitoring of employee's emails, rather of having salubrious affect on the work culture of company would have disastrous effects. This kind of monitoring would be an indication of attack on the privacy of employees, further it is not specified that whether emails monitored are company emails or all the emails because some of emails are kind of private one for example, if routine check up of all the emails are conducted in the company then there are some emails which employees do not want to share with others but conducting check up of such kind of emails would come into the light of public. Therefore, this kind of policy would be an indication of attack on privacy of employees.
Further, it can be said that this kind of policy would have disastrous consequences on the company as this kind of policy would reduce the morale, team spirit and loyalty of employees towards the company. Reduction in these factors would ultimately lead to worsening of work culture, lose of economy.
It can be concluded that by ignoring the critical factors that are essential for the assessment of the statement given above, the issue becomes unilateral and subject to subjective generalization. On grounds of pure logic and reason one cannot agree with the statement which suffers a great extent due to use of words that are in themselves poorly defined and used in desultory manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 118, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ees emails, rather of having salubrious affect on the work culture of company would have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the emails') or simply say ''some emails''.
Suggestion: some of the emails; some emails
...ompany emails or all the emails because some of emails are kind of private one for example, if...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to use of words that are in themselves poorly defined and used in desultory man...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2359.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20750551876 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81979431083 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.42825607064 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 763.2 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.862624803 60.3974514979 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.266666667 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350469909289 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133213958711 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126060392522 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191217696525 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147404129979 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.