Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Some people believes that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society while others believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. The former is believable statement since it does not indulge in the inordinate word choice while the latter statement comes across as an overt generalization in which some are used randomly reducing the efficacy of the same. The statement becomes polemical and subjective in nature so as a reader one cannot agree with the sentiment expressed by the latter statement.
To begin with, the latter statement states that teaching morality should be foundation of education instead of logical reasoning but this statement holds a parochial viewpoint. Emphasizing morality over logical reasoning instead of having salubrious effect on students can result in causing detrimental effects such as reducing the power of debating with decrease in the curiosity level among students for example, in a class of etiquette it is morally wrong to hinder the teacher lecture but if that teacher teaches something which is factually wrong, a student instilled with morality teaching would not question the teacher instead grasp that fact thinking of being correct but same student if instilled with logical reasoning might have questioned with teacher and make him/her realize the mistake. Therefore, students must be taught logical reasoning instead of morality.
It can be stated that teaching logical reasoning instead of morality to students would have a salubrious effect on the intellectual ability of students. Further it would increase the critical decision making of students which is essential for every human being to master for the better future and thus boost the confidence level of students. For example, in war decision have to be made based on the situation without considering emotions but an army based on morality cannot take decision ignoring the emotions which can have detrimental effects later. So society should focus on logical reasoning as educational base instead of morality.
It can be said that morality over logical reasoning would not lead to a better society rather can lead to destructive one . We can look to the human history most of the wars fought based on the religious beliefs of the kingdoms which they thought to be morally correct leading to hundreds thousands of death. Thus a society based on logical reasoning would produce a moral society.
The former statement which states that some people believes that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society is cogent and well articulated but latter comes across as an overt generalization which is subjective and marginal. Thus, on grounds of pure logic and reason we cannot agree with the sentiment expressed by the latter statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers CleanAll was found to remove 40 more dirt and kill 30 more bacteria than the next best cleanser Furthermore a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far fewer 69
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 56
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 75
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 79
- The increase in automation will lead to people loosing their jobs 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...states that teaching morality should be foundation of education instead of logical reasoni...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stilled with morality teaching would not question the teacher instead grasp that ...
^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ciety rather can lead to destructive one . We can look to the human history most o...
^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...leading to hundreds thousands of death. Thus a society based on logical reasoning wo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29580573951 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70619881068 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423841059603 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.9 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 129.22239228 60.3974514979 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.933333333 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420947310194 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176958353434 0.0831039109588 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172733701103 0.0758088955206 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271761845917 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907843494903 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.