Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
The speaker claims that routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence by company management reduces the waste of time and system capacity, additionally, this also helps to protect the company from lawsuits. Logically, the statement mentioned is agreeable, but the last point of advantage said, 'as well as protect the company from lawsuits', will definitely turn out as a hostile environment. Every documentation of the company stays in the company is an unsaid policy the employes will be bound to. Being scornful about it will leave a subtle mark on the trust issue, which will lead to employee dissatisfaction. Otherwise, the statement is practical and certainly helpful. This monitoring helps both management and employees themselves, as a case of refreshment from the stress of the previous quarter (or any particular period of time).
Admittedly, there will be some conflicts with employees' privacy and trust. For example, any employee got very amenable with any of the company's clients and pitched a deck as per the requirement of the client with a pinch of palpable personal of his own. This indeed will be noticeable to the client, but at the time when credit sharing comes into the picture then the convolution begins. He can not ask that corresponding client for any evidence, divulging his idea as his personal thing is uncomfortable, and many will be claiming credits on a single project. Then if any person chooses to behave couth in this enigmatic situation, they remain silent and there start impeding the progression. Any set of rules in a company preventing the career growth of any of its employees is hazardous.
On the other hand, the data can be verified, the current status of the client can be accessed, the adeptness of the group can be judged, and any prudent boss will want this regular monitoring. On the top of my head, if any error is made by the team of the client and reported as a mistake by the company and consequently the employees themselves, in that case, if the revisit to that particular documentation is done regularly, any manager will have a palpable idea and will foresee the consequences, which indeed recovers company from any kind of lawsuits.
In sum, I think monitoring the email correspondence of any employee after being moderated by the employee himself and accepted to upload for the cause will be a wise thing to do. Providing overtness for any employee in any company is the first and foremost thing to be pursued by the manager or the boss. As many said being obscure and maintaining the separate circles of one's life in an organized way keeps one away from deep convolutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 832, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the previous quarter or any particular period of time. Admittedly, there will be some confl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 754, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
... a company preventing the career growth of any of its employees is hazardous. On the ot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... employees themselves, in that case, if the revisit to that particular documentation is don...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...and maintaining the separate circles of ones life in an organized way keeps one away...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, then, well, for example, i think, kind of, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9393258427 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8984896528 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510112359551 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1283952831 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.294117647 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1764705882 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266620685608 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985998660666 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108865992516 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181737417531 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129721977883 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.