Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.
Nowadays, the idea of using competitions to improve the potential of the competitor has gotten important. Despite this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether the competition destroys the quality of learning or not. I am afraid, I disagree with limiting the quality by the competition. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, improving a competitor is the first and foremost reason to persuade us to use the idea of the competition. To put on the other hand, the competition encourages competitors and compels them to try harder. It is crystal clear, everyone tries to be on his high performance and wants to defeat his rivals. Let's consider an example to drive this fact home, two companies which are trying to attract people for selling their production never forget to try for the improvement of the production, because both of them are in the competition and trying to win the competition.
Furthermore, competitors help each other to stay at a high level for a long time. To be specific, two competitors decide to reach the goals and see each other in this way hence for winning this game, enhancing their potential and changing their condition to elevate their level. As a result, both of them are at the best level for a long time. To make my points of view clear, Look at Ronaldo and Messi, both of them are in the high level of soccer players for a long period and also they remain in the history of soccer. If they had never met each other, they would never be in the high level of soccer for almost 10 years.
Without any shadow of a doubt, competition has its negative problems and can influence the competitor woefully. It is true, having good effects of competition depends on the personality of the competitors. Sometimes, the winner tries to destroy the loser or in some cases, the loser after losing never came back and cannot encounter difficulties. Surely, in these cases, we should consider the personality of the rivals and try to diminish the bad effects of competition. To easily perceive my words, lock at Apple, a famous company in technology, after having problems in selling computers, if they had never tried to come back, they would never see the success.
In conclusion, I do believe the competition has positive effects. Since it makes the competitors improve themselves and also be at a high level for a long time. However, it has negative effects if the personality of the competitors is weak in coming back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ormance and wants to defeat his rivals. Lets consider an example to drive this fact ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, in conclusion, as a result, i am afraid, in some cases, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80787037037 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81570462148 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483796296296 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0533049192 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9047619048 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232934207994 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072953564135 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063805648605 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130282408078 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587709778539 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.