In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Nowadays, using cars, gradually, decrease in comparison with years, before. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question whether, in the next twenty years, there will be a fewer cars or not. I agree with the idea expressing we have a fewer number of cars in the future. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
To begin with, new cars have negative effects on the environment and in the next two decays, people have to stop using these kinds of cars. To put on the other hands, the cars which do not use some types of energy like electric or solar energy are, strongly, harmful for the ecosystem and if people notice these result, they will come to an end of using their automobiles. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home. I am going to speak about my brother who always used to drive for going to his work and everywhere. Driving was an inseparable part of his life and he did not want to quit it. He had been using his car for several years until he participated in an event about the influences of cars on our planet. Buying a bicycle and biking, was the first and foremost consequence of the taking apart in that event. After a while, he used transportation instead of his car. My brother had stopped using his car because he noticed the negative effects of his car and it can happen for all people in the world.
Furthermore, in the future, there will be fewer cars not only for the sake of caring environment but also because people try to use their time and their money, efficiently. To be specific, everyone wants to arrive at his destination, as soon as possible, and some transportation such as subway and bus services have less cost and also help to escape from heavy traffic. As an illustration, I have been working for a computer company since I migrated to Tehran. Once upon a time, while I was preparing for one meeting, I noticed, I understood the time of the meeting wrong. As a result, I had to use the subway instead of my car and unlike my expectation, I arrived at the company soon. This happening had influenced my thought about transportation. If I had never used the subway for going to my work, I would use my car, until now.
In conclusion, I do believe, in the future, people will use their cars less than today. Since they find the negative impacts of their cars and also they try to save their money and use their time in the best way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...my idea is explored in the following. To begin with, new cars have negative ef...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n happen for all people in the world. Furthermore, in the future, there will ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work, I would use my car, until now. In conclusion, I do believe, in the fut...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 443.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48532731377 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59161481418 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492099322799 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4272085495 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3181818182 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326167355786 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916222686371 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921079132193 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201988272759 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333867882645 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.