Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The importance of doing works completely, which exerts a remarkably positive effect on other people's opinions about us, so that one will solve their problems much (easily), can hardly be overstated. Regarding this, while a few people opine people being busy and cannot carry out their tasks very well, I personally reckon that people, today, can perform many tasks properly.
To begin with, planning leads to peoples' witnessing more prosper in doing their tasks. In other words, having a plan lays a fertile groundwork for people to give priority to their jobs, and this helps them to manage their time to carry out a duty carefully. Carefulness provides them with the opportunity of doing many tasks very well, as a result. As a case in point, my father has worked for several companies for years. He is so busy, and he has not a boatload of time, yet he conveniently accomplishes his project owing to his ability to make a plan in order to work. Had he never had the ability to manage his time, he would not perform his project very well now.
Moreover, having experienced the progress of technology, people have many chances to work at each time and each place. This means that in the past, people had to go out so that they can do their chores; however, today, individuals having spent most of their time in houses can do boatloads of things, and it is possible for them to do their job at the middle of the night, which grant them much more time to accomplish their task. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home; my brother is a person working for a computer company, and also he plays music and paints; he sometimes works in other companies too, but he performs all of his tasks very well owing to making use of technology to do his task. He told me, in the past he could not manage all of his jobs because he had to go to his office regularly. Had the development in technology took place in the past, he would not have faced those difficulties.
To sum up, in spite of the fact that a few people conclude owing to being busy people carry out a few tasks very well, I would like to cast doubt on it since planning and the use of technology helps them to do their tasks very well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The importance of doing works completely...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay, can perform many tasks properly. To begin with, planning leads to peoples...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t perform his project very well now. Moreover, having experienced the progres...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not have faced those difficulties. To sum up, in spite of the fact that a f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, as a result, in other words, in spite of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47277227723 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39814953946 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480198019802 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.0522946601 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192880694046 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082120559703 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743435637758 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153091322888 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379511691492 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.1575268817 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.