Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev

Essay topics:

Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Education is the most essential component for a student’s future. The prompt states that competition between students for higher ranks is limiting the student’s learning levels. In my opinion, I agree with the statement and argue that student must learn the concept rather than fighting for the higher rank.

To begin, nowadays every educational institution is forcing student to get a class top mark rather than trying to teach them in a better way. Schools are injecting the information forcefully into their brains so that they can remember them by heart. Remembering by heart doesn’t help as people tend to forget in a few months. However, if the concept is learnt with a good understanding then there is very less probability of forgetting the concept because student has learnt it and analyzed it.

Further, just because of the competition for the higher rank, the quality of the education has declined rapidly. Instead of teaching the subject teachers are making students to memorize the concept and using the formulas to solve the problems. For instance, in India for 12th students, the goal is to get into a IIT(Indian Institute of Technology) or NIT (National Institute of Technology). For this purpose, teachers behave in an obdurate way such as just making the students to practice the practical problems without teaching them the theory. Students might get selected into his ambitious college but what is the beneficial if there is no application knowledge. The above example states that because of the competition between the students, they are forced to by heart the questions rather than practically applying it.

There are few students who are really merit. They understand the concept and they apply it practically. However, Education board must take necessary action on this because the future of the country and world lies in the younger generations. If they are not aware of any practical purpose then development and innovation in any field gets stagnated instead of growing.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 422, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an obdurate way" with adverb for "obdurate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...logy. For this purpose, teachers behave in an obdurate way such as just making the students to pra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 39, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'merited'.
Suggestion: merited
... There are few students who are really merit. They understand the concept and they a...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, then, as to, for instance, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 13.6137724551 37% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 2260.96107784 75% => OK
No of words: 325.0 441.139720559 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23692307692 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82426342704 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550769230769 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 705.55239521 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3374259887 57.8364921388 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.117647059 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.70786347227 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0958303702976 0.218282227539 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340568928604 0.0743258471296 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443708959258 0.0701772020484 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621676886397 0.128457276422 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568681220624 0.0628817314937 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.5979740519 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.