The concept of free will is a fallacy. Many actions are not the product of choice; thus, people should not be held responsible for them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement states that the concept of free-will is rife with gap since many actions undertaken are not resulted from direct choice, rather people are forced upon to do so. I partially agree with the topic.
Apparently, how with act out during our everyday life or under special circumstance depends on what we choice to do. But this is what it seems when view from a distance.
At supermarket, one customer might shout on a shopkeeper since he felt he was dealing with them rudely. On the other hand the second would complain in normal but firm tone.
In a locality, one woman would keep up with domestic abuse as she would want to continue her marriage, compromising herself respect, while her neighbor would file for divorce after she finds her husband is abusive with her since she would not to be treated that way.
A fifth grader concentrates during lecture and will clear exam in flying colors. His classmate who had not paid attention to studies ended up repeating the year.
In all the case, people act the way they feel appropriate and suitable. However, if you closely look at the bigger picture, their conducts are often dictated by their background. These are not chosen by these people themselves, but are pushed into by other around them.
Now, the person who acted out loudly might have not been to school as for his family education was never priority. The second person who behaved in civilized manner might a professional and belongs to a family of intellects. Now these two men never chose their families but rather were born there.
The two women who took different measure while they found themselves in abusive relationship could be because the prior one might not been educated enough to financial support her children and therefore decided to remain silent for what seems to her their betterment. The latter could be financial independent woman, brought up in a setup where female are aware of their rights. These two women never chose the kind of upbringing they received from their parents.
The response of the two pupil of the same class might be different since the first child might be get care, love and attention of his parent, while the second one would be facing the consequences of dysfunctional family. Now, neither of the children opted for their respective families.
Even though, at first glance it might seems people have free will and act how they choose to deal with the condition. But, taking a microscopic view, one observe the acts are conditional responses. People’s conduct are reflection of what surrounds them rather than own will.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'since the felt'?
Suggestion: since the felt
...ne customer might shout on a shopkeeper since he felt he was dealing with them rudely. On the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, as for, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89569160998 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51351108602 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.1631120529 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8695652174 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1739130435 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65217391304 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.97078651685 201% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145084835164 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386544384117 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437822495641 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615163970846 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575750925473 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.